Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit the main index.
You can also download the archives in mbox format.

bug-gnulib (date)

[Thread Index][Top][All Lists]

Advanced

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Wed Nov 30 2005 19:32:23 -0500 Messages in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

---

• November 30, 2005
  • Re: FYI: new openat-like function: mkdirat, James Youngman, 19:32
  • Re: FYI: new openat-like function: mkdirat, Roland McGrath, 19:15
  • Re: FYI: new openat-like function: mkdirat, Roland McGrath, 19:15
  • Re: FYI: new openat-like function: mkdirat, Roland McGrath, 19:15
  • Re: FYI: new openat-like function: mkdirat, Jim Meyering, 17:34
  • Re: FYI: new openat-like function: mkdirat, Jim Meyering, 16:08
  • Re: FYI: new openat-like function: mkdirat, Jim Meyering, 15:53
  • FYI: new openat-like function: mkdirat, Jim Meyering, 08:40
  • Re: Symbol availability in C, C++, Paul Eggert, 01:33
• November 29, 2005
  • new function fdsavedir (needed for GNU tar), Paul Eggert, 13:49
• November 28, 2005
  • Re: Symbol availability in C, C++, Albert Chin, 20:47
  • Re: Symbol availability in C, C++, Paul Eggert, 19:43
  • Re: Symbol availability in C, C++, Albert Chin, 18:08
  • Re: Symbol availability in C, C++, Paul Eggert, 16:04
  • Re: Symbol availability in C, C++, Albert Chin, 08:11
  • Re: Symbol availability in C, C++, James Youngman, 03:42
  • Re: stdint_.h vs intmax_t & uintmax_t, Paul Eggert, 01:26
  • Re: lib/stdbool_.h doesn't honor HAVE__BOOL, Paul Eggert, 01:15
  • Re: Symbol availability in C, C++, Paul Eggert, 01:08
• November 27, 2005
  • Re: stdint_.h vs intmax_t & uintmax_t, Mark D. Baushke, 18:01
  • Re: findutils-4.2.26 build error on HP-UX 10.20], James Youngman, 02:55
• November 26, 2005
  • Re: lib/stdbool_.h doesn't honor HAVE__BOOL, Albert Chin, 03:17
  • Re: lib/stdbool_.h doesn't honor HAVE__BOOL, Paul Eggert, 02:11
  • Symbol availability in C, C++, Albert Chin, 02:05
• November 25, 2005
  • Re: obstack issue, Paul Eggert, 23:26
  • Re: obstack issue, Davide Angelocola, 21:05
  • obstack issue, Davide Angelocola, 21:05
  • lib/stdbool_.h doesn't honor HAVE__BOOL, Albert Chin, 18:57
• November 22, 2005
  • Re: socklen_t, Paul Eggert, 14:37
  • Re: findutils-4.2.26 build error on HP-UX 10.20, Peter Fales, 14:34
  • Re: findutils-4.2.26 build error on HP-UX 10.20, Peter Fales, 14:30
  • Re: findutils-4.2.26 build error on HP-UX 10.20, Peter Fales, 14:19
  • Re: bugs in dirname module - gnulib portion, Paul Eggert, 14:07
  • Re: findutils-4.2.26 build error on HP-UX 10.20, Paul Eggert, 13:58
  • Re: bugs in dirname module - gnulib portion, Eric Blake, 09:06
• November 21, 2005
  • Re: findutils-4.2.26 build error on HP-UX 10.20, James Youngman, 20:19
  • Re: bugs in dirname module - gnulib portion, Paul Eggert, 19:43
  • Re: bugs in dirname module - gnulib portion, Eric Blake, 08:48
• November 20, 2005
  • Re: socklen_t, Albert Chin, 19:14
• November 18, 2005
  • Re: bugs in dirname module, Jim Meyering, 08:28
  • Re: style question - const char *, Jim Meyering, 08:25
  • Re: style question - const char *, Paul Eggert, 01:38
• November 17, 2005
  • style question - const char *, Eric Blake, 23:53
  • Re: bugs in dirname module, Eric Blake, 19:08
  • Re: bugs in dirname module, Eric Blake, 19:04
  • Re: bugs in dirname module, Jim Meyering, 17:57
  • Re: bugs in dirname module, Paul Eggert, 15:59
  • Re: bugs in dirname module, Eric Blake, 08:29
• November 16, 2005
  • Re: bugs in dirname module, Paul Eggert, 15:50
  • Re: regex module breaks distcheck, Sergey Poznyakoff, 04:33
• November 15, 2005
  • Re: regex module breaks distcheck, Paul Eggert, 15:00
  • Re: stdint_.h vs intmax_t & uintmax_t, Paul Eggert, 14:14
  • regex module breaks distcheck, Sergey Poznyakoff, 14:09
  • Re: c99+ pragma is ignored by gcc -std=gnu99, Jim Meyering, 14:03
  • Re: c99+ pragma is ignored by gcc -std=gnu99, Paul Eggert, 13:51
  • c99+ pragma is ignored by gcc -std=gnu99, Jim Meyering, 11:41
  • Re: stdint_.h vs intmax_t & uintmax_t, Mark D. Baushke, 06:00
  • Re: stdint_.h vs intmax_t & uintmax_t, Paul Eggert, 01:58
• November 14, 2005
  • Re: stdint_.h vs intmax_t & uintmax_t, Mark D. Baushke, 20:53
  • Re: stdint_.h vs intmax_t & uintmax_t, Paul Eggert, 19:45
  • stdint_.h vs intmax_t & uintmax_t, Mark D. Baushke, 17:03
  • Re: Maintenance of config.rpath and lib-link.m4, Paul Eggert, 16:33
  • Re: mkstemp-safer.c must include <config.h>, Jim Meyering, 06:38
  • mkstemp-safer.c must include <config.h>, Jim Meyering, 02:51
• November 12, 2005
  • Re: gethrxtime: fall back on gettime?, Jim Meyering, 14:07
  • openat status: new glibc emulation, Jim Meyering, 09:51
  • why we need openat et al in the kernel, Jim Meyering, 09:12
  • Re: gethrxtime: fall back on gettime?, Paul Eggert, 01:57
• November 11, 2005
  • Re: gethrxtime: fall back on gettime?, Jim Meyering, 17:23
  • Re: bugs in dirname module, Eric Blake, 08:33
  • Re: bugs in dirname module, Paul Eggert, 00:57
• November 10, 2005
  • Re: bugs in dirname module, Eric Blake, 23:38
  • Re: bugs in dirname module, Paul Eggert, 20:44
  • Re: gethrxtime: fall back on gettime?, Paul Eggert, 15:25
  • gethrxtime: fall back on gettime?, Jim Meyering, 10:55
  • Re: readline fix, Eric Blake, 10:24
  • Re: readline fix, Simon Josefsson, 09:51
  • Re: readline fix, Eric Blake, 00:05
• November 09, 2005
  • Re: bugs in dirname module, Eric Blake, 23:19
  • readline fix, Simon Josefsson, 21:18
  • Re: xstrtoimax compilation warning on Solaris 7, Paul Eggert, 16:25
  • Re: bugs in dirname module, Paul Eggert, 16:19
  • Re: namespace conflict for des, Paul Eggert, 16:11
  • Re: xstrtoimax compilation warning on Solaris 7, Larry Jones, 10:41
  • Re: bugs in dirname module, Bruno Haible, 05:55
  • Re: xstrtoimax compilation warning on Solaris 7, Larry Jones, 00:01
• November 08, 2005
  • Re: bugs in dirname module, Eric Blake, 23:57
  • Re: xstrtoimax compilation warning on Solaris 7, Eric Blake, 23:56
  • Re: xstrtoimax compilation warning on Solaris 7, Eric Blake, 22:59
  • Re: bug in getaddrinfo module, Simon Josefsson, 19:59
  • Re: xstrtoimax compilation warning on Solaris 7, Paul Eggert, 16:18
  • Re: bug in getaddrinfo module, Eric Blake, 15:37
  • Re: bug in getaddrinfo module, Simon Josefsson, 14:22
  • bug in getaddrinfo module, Eric Blake, 11:59
  • xstrtoimax compilation warning on Solaris 7, Eric Blake, 11:12
  • Re: bugs in dirname module, Eric Blake, 09:22
• November 07, 2005
  • Re: bugs in dirname module, Paul Eggert, 16:03
  • Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: restrict.m4: do not punish autoconf 2.59 users, Ralf Wildenhues, 13:04
  • Re: bug in gc-arcfour-tests, Eric Blake, 08:58
  • Re: bugs in dirname module, Eric Blake, 08:43
• November 06, 2005
  • Re: bug in gc-arcfour-tests, Simon Josefsson, 21:51
  • Re: bugs in dirname module, Paul Eggert, 06:00
  • bugs in dirname module, Eric Blake, 00:02
• November 05, 2005
  • bug in gc-arcfour-tests, Eric Blake, 13:37
  • Re: {base,dir}name // semantics, Paul Eggert, 01:05
• November 04, 2005
  • Re: {base,dir}name // semantics, Eric Blake, 22:45
  • Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: gnulib-tool questions, Bruno Haible, 13:25
  • Re: gnulib-tool questions, Simon Josefsson, 10:33
  • gnulib-tool questions, Eric Blake, 09:30

---

[Prev Period]

[Next Period]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc