[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-gnulib] nanosleep module and mingw32
From: |
Martin Lambers |
Subject: |
Re: [bug-gnulib] nanosleep module and mingw32 |
Date: |
Fri, 19 May 2006 08:40:40 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6i |
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 10:23:49PM +0200, Bruno Haible wrote:
> > +#ifdef _WIN32
>
> The conditional for Woe32 platforms, excluding Cygwin (which has normal Unix
> API),
> is
> #if (defined _WIN32 || defined __WIN32__) && !defined __CYGWIN__
Sorry, I somehow missed your mail about Cygwin defining _WIN32 nowadays.
I thought that
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gnulib.bugs/4203/match=mingw+msvc+win32+mingw32
was still up to date.
> Also, it's stylistically preferrable to put platform dependent include files
> after the last platform-independent include file, not before.
Thanks, I'll try to remember that.
For the nanosleep module, however, I like Simon's idea to use the unistd
module instead.
Martin
- nanosleep module and mingw32, Martin Lambers, 2006/05/18
- Re: [bug-gnulib] nanosleep module and mingw32, Bruno Haible, 2006/05/18
- Re: [bug-gnulib] nanosleep module and mingw32,
Martin Lambers <=
- Re: nanosleep module and mingw32, Simon Josefsson, 2006/05/18
- Re: nanosleep module and mingw32, Jim Meyering, 2006/05/19
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: nanosleep module and mingw32, Bruno Haible, 2006/05/19
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: nanosleep module and mingw32, Paul Eggert, 2006/05/19
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: nanosleep module and mingw32, Martin Lambers, 2006/05/21
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: nanosleep module and mingw32, Paul Eggert, 2006/05/22
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: nanosleep module and mingw32, Martin Lambers, 2006/05/22
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: nanosleep module and mingw32, Paul Eggert, 2006/05/23
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: nanosleep module and mingw32, Martin Lambers, 2006/05/23