Re: regexprops-generic.texi module?

[James Youngman]

On 8/22/06, Eric Blake <address@hidden> wrote:
> I went ahead with the whole new module approach.  James, I hope you don't
> mind being listed as a maintainer

That's fine.    There is an argument for moving findutils'
findutils/lib/regexprops.c into gnulib (and hence making findutils an
ordinary downstream user of the module).   However, I don't have a
very strong opinon about that.

> (it shouldn't be too hard to get you
> gnulib write access, if you need it).

I don't think maintainership of one module justifies it, for the
moment I will just continue to send patches.    If I ever develop a
history of submitting gnulib patches that don't need improvement
before being submitted, then maybe it would be reasonable to revisit
the decision.

James.