Re: [bug-gnulib] gpl and lgpl texi

[Bruno Haible]

Furthermore lgpl.texi creates an entry in the index, but gpl.texi doesn't.

Also when you have a package partially under GPL, partially under LGPL,
and partially under FDL, the title "Copying" of gpl.texi makes no sense
any more. The other title "Library Copying" is nonsense as well, since
RMS doesn't recomment the LGPL for libraries.

I'm using this patch:

--- gnulib/doc/gpl.texi 2006-05-30 20:12:40.000000000 +0200
+++ gpl.texi    2006-04-12 00:57:38.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
address@hidden Copying
address@hidden GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
address@hidden GNU GPL
address@hidden GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
address@hidden GPL, GNU General Public License
address@hidden License, GNU GPL
 @center Version 2, June 1991
 
 @c This file is intended to be included in another file.
--- gnulib/doc/lgpl.texi        2006-05-30 20:12:40.000000000 +0200
+++ lgpl.texi   2006-04-12 00:58:56.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
address@hidden Library Copying
address@hidden GNU LGPL
 @appendixsec GNU LESSER GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
-
address@hidden LGPL, Lesser General Public License
address@hidden LGPL, GNU Lesser General Public License
address@hidden License, GNU LGPL
 @center Version 2.1, February 1999
 
 @display