Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit the main index.
You can also download the archives in mbox format.

bug-gnulib (date)

[Thread Index][Top][All Lists]

Advanced

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Sun Dec 31 2006 23:53:48 -0500 Messages in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

---

• December 31, 2006
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Bruce Korb, 23:53
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Richard Kenner, 21:54
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Ian Lance Taylor, 21:50
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Richard Kenner, 21:42
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Ian Lance Taylor, 21:40
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Ian Lance Taylor, 21:13
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Richard Kenner, 20:57
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Richard Kenner, 20:54
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Seongbae Park, 20:54
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Richard Kenner, 20:52
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Ian Lance Taylor, 20:36
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Paul Eggert, 20:32
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", David Daney, 20:22
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Paul Eggert, 20:21
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Vincent Lefevre, 20:04
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Daniel Berlin, 19:17
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Daniel Berlin, 19:13
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Richard Kenner, 15:40
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Richard Guenther, 15:00
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Gabriel Dos Reis, 14:52
  • RE: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Dave Korn, 14:52
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Richard Kenner, 14:40
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Paul Eggert, 14:38
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Karl Berry, 14:37
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Richard Guenther, 14:21
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Gerald Pfeifer, 14:19
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Robert Dewar, 14:15
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Robert Dewar, 14:11
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Bernd Schmidt, 14:09
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Gabriel Dos Reis, 13:56
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Bruce Korb, 13:55
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Paul Eggert, 13:47
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Gabriel Dos Reis, 13:38
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Gabriel Dos Reis, 13:31
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Richard Kenner, 13:13
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Gabriel Dos Reis, 12:39
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Gabriel Dos Reis, 12:24
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Robert Dewar, 12:04
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Duncan Sands, 11:52
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Robert Dewar, 11:39
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Richard Kenner, 11:32
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Vincent Lefevre, 11:24
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Robert Dewar, 11:13
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Robert Dewar, 11:10
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Vincent Lefevre, 11:08
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Robert Dewar, 11:01
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Vincent Lefevre, 10:59
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Vincent Lefevre, 10:47
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Richard Kenner, 10:22
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Richard Kenner, 10:20
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Richard Kenner, 10:19
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Richard Kenner, 10:14
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Vincent Lefevre, 10:09
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Robert Dewar, 10:07
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Vincent Lefevre, 09:48
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Richard Guenther, 09:45
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Daniel Berlin, 09:41
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Vincent Lefevre, 09:39
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Richard Kenner, 09:29
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Robert Dewar, 09:27
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Robert Dewar, 09:22
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Vincent Lefevre, 09:19
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Richard Kenner, 09:19
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Michael Veksler, 09:19
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Vincent Lefevre, 09:16
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Richard Kenner, 09:10
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Richard Kenner, 08:58
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Robert Dewar, 08:56
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Robert Dewar, 08:55
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Richard Kenner, 08:45
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Vincent Lefevre, 08:40
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Richard Kenner, 08:40
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Richard Guenther, 08:40
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Robert Dewar, 08:40
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Duncan Sands, 08:40
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Vincent Lefevre, 08:40
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Zdenek Dvorak, 08:40
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Michael Veksler, 08:40
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Steven Bosscher, 08:40
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Richard Guenther, 08:40
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Richard Kenner, 08:33
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Robert Dewar, 08:29
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Richard Kenner, 08:20
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Richard Kenner, 08:15
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Gabriel Dos Reis, 07:03
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Richard Guenther, 06:46
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Gabriel Dos Reis, 06:43
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Richard Guenther, 06:04
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Andreas Schwab, 05:03
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Paul Eggert, 04:49
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Gabriel Dos Reis, 04:49
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Gabriel Dos Reis, 04:45
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Gabriel Dos Reis, 04:39
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Ian Lance Taylor, 02:55
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Paul Eggert, 02:30
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Joe Buck, 01:55
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Joe Buck, 01:49
  • Re: coreutils bootstrapping issue on non-GNU platforms, Paul Eggert, 01:33
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Paul Eggert, 01:09
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Paul Eggert, 00:57
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Paul Eggert, 00:52
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Richard Kenner, 00:10
• December 30, 2006
  • Re: coreutils bootstrapping issue on non-GNU platforms, Eric Blake, 23:14
  • coreutils bootstrapping issue on non-GNU platforms, Bob Proulx, 23:03
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Robert Dewar, 22:12
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Bernd Schmidt, 21:01
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Richard Kenner, 20:52
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Richard Kenner, 20:49
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Robert Dewar, 20:42
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Joe Buck, 20:42
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Robert Dewar, 20:42
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Andrew Pinski, 20:42
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Robert Dewar, 20:42
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Robert Dewar, 20:42
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Robert Dewar, 20:42
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Gabriel Dos Reis, 20:42
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Gabriel Dos Reis, 20:42
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Andrew Pinski, 20:42
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Robert Dewar, 20:42
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Joe Buck, 20:34
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Robert Dewar, 20:20
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Gabriel Dos Reis, 19:44
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Robert Dewar, 19:30
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Robert Dewar, 19:28
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Richard Kenner, 19:24
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Paul Eggert, 19:13
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Richard Kenner, 19:09
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Richard Kenner, 18:56
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Gabriel Dos Reis, 18:41
  • Re: AmigaOS4 port - patch attached, Paul Eggert, 18:31
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Richard Guenther, 18:30
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Gabriel Dos Reis, 18:19
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Richard Kenner, 18:10
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Richard Guenther, 17:58
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Gabriel Dos Reis, 17:56
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Richard Kenner, 17:25
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Paul Eggert, 17:20
  • RE: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Dave Korn, 15:02
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Kaveh R. GHAZI, 13:57
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Gabriel Dos Reis, 13:52
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Kaveh R. GHAZI, 13:31
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Andreas Büning, 10:59
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Eric Blake, 09:35
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Bernd Schmidt, 09:13
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Bernd Schmidt, 09:13
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Bernd Schmidt, 09:13
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Robert Dewar, 08:14
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Richard Kenner, 08:04
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Richard Kenner, 08:03
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Richard Kenner, 07:56
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Richard Guenther, 07:22
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Robert Dewar, 06:48
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Paul Eggert, 03:43
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Andrew Pinski, 03:00
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Paul Eggert, 02:56
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Paul Eggert, 02:41
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Seongbae Park, 01:06
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Seongbae Park, 01:06
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Richard Kenner, 00:02
• December 29, 2006
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Richard Kenner, 23:12
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Daniel Berlin, 22:54
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Daniel Berlin, 22:49
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Daniel Berlin, 22:48
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Paul Eggert, 21:06
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Bruce Korb, 20:29
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Paul Eggert, 20:09
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Andrew Pinski, 20:04
  • Re: regex maintenance?, Karl Berry, 19:55
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Paul Eggert, 19:35
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Richard Kenner, 19:21
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Paul Eggert, 19:13
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Richard Kenner, 18:58
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Richard Guenther, 18:58
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Daniel Jacobowitz, 18:58
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Scott Robert Ladd, 18:58
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Paul Eggert, 18:45
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Robert Dewar, 17:22
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Gabriel Dos Reis, 17:14
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Paul Eggert, 17:06
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Richard B. Kreckel, 16:57
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Florian Weimer, 16:47
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Florian Weimer, 16:44
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Richard Guenther, 16:43
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Paul Eggert, 16:29
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Daniel Berlin, 15:51
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Daniel Berlin, 15:51
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Richard Guenther, 15:51
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Daniel Berlin, 15:51
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Daniel Berlin, 15:51
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Thomas Neumann, 15:15
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Gabriel Dos Reis, 15:04
  • Re: gnulib - CVS version from 20061229, Paul Eggert, 14:38
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Gabriel Dos Reis, 14:15
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Robert Dewar, 14:02
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Gabriel Dos Reis, 13:34
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Gabriel Dos Reis, 13:01
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Andrew Pinski, 12:31
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Gabriel Dos Reis, 12:21
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Andrew Pinski, 11:52
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Gabriel Dos Reis, 11:49
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Gabriel Dos Reis, 11:40
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Andrew Pinski, 11:14
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Ian Lance Taylor, 10:58
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Paul Eggert, 03:55
  • Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Paul Eggert, 02:11
  • Re: regex maintenance?, Paul Eggert, 01:10
• December 28, 2006
  • Re: regex maintenance?, Karl Berry, 18:56
  • Re: [PATCH] lib/argp.h: remove __NTH for __argp_usage inline function, Paul Eggert, 18:37
  • Re: [PATCH] modules/error: depend on progname module, Sven Verdoolaege, 17:21
  • Re: announce-gen, Jim Meyering, 14:28
  • Re: No module file for announce-gen?, Jim Meyering, 13:47
  • announce-gen, Simon Josefsson, 13:46
  • Re: No module file for announce-gen?, Simon Josefsson, 13:28
  • Re: No module file for announce-gen?, Jim Meyering, 13:18
  • No module file for announce-gen?, Simon Josefsson, 13:13
  • Re: iconv modules, Simon Josefsson, 12:59
  • [PATCH] lib/argp.h: remove __NTH for __argp_usage inline function, skimo, 10:51
  • Re: converting gnulib: cvs to git, Jim Meyering, 09:58
  • Re: regex maintenance?, Paul Eggert, 03:21
  • Re: [PATCH] gnulib-tool: func_emit_initmacro_end: use $SED from configure, Paul Eggert, 03:01
• December 27, 2006
  • Re: [PATCH] modules/error: depend on progname module, Eric Blake, 23:23
  • regex maintenance?, Karl Berry, 18:17
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Toon Moene, 16:50
  • [PATCH] modules/error: depend on progname module, skimo, 16:50
  • [PATCH] gnulib-tool: func_emit_initmacro_end: use $SED from configure, skimo, 16:50
  • Re: coreutils 6.6 fails to compile on IRIX 5.3, Paul Eggert, 15:55
  • Re: proposed patches to mbchar, mbswidth, wcwidth to use new wctype module, Paul Eggert, 14:58
  • Re: Buildbot failures, Simon Josefsson, 11:14
  • Re: coreutils 6.6 fails to compile on IRIX 5.3, Jim Meyering, 10:10
  • Re: coreutils 6.6 fails to compile on IRIX 5.3, Eric Blake, 08:27
  • Re: coreutils 6.6 fails to compile on IRIX 5.3, Eric Blake, 08:18
  • Re: converting gnulib: cvs to git, Jim Meyering, 04:34
• December 26, 2006
  • Re: coreutils 6.6 fails to compile on IRIX 5.3, Eric Blake, 19:18
  • Re: Is / distinct from //?, Paul Eggert, 18:53
  • Re: Is / distinct from //?, Paul Gilmartin, 16:59
  • Re: proposed patches to mbchar, mbswidth, wcwidth to use new wctype module, Eric Blake, 16:49
  • clean-temp and large files, Eric Blake, 16:35
  • Re: Buildbot failures, Eric Blake, 13:41
  • Buildbot failures, Simon Josefsson, 13:23
  • Re: converting gnulib: cvs to git, Eric Blake, 09:02
• December 25, 2006
  • sed --posix change to gnulib-tool broke coreutils on Solaris, Paul Eggert, 20:54
• December 24, 2006
  • Re: re_compile_pattern change, Paul Eggert, 20:28
  • FYI: work around fchownat bug in glibc-2.4, Jim Meyering, 12:09
  • Re: coreutils 6.6 fails to compile on IRIX 5.3, Paul Eggert, 02:56
  • Re: make safe_read usable in a mixed C/C++ build, Eric Blake, 00:09
• December 23, 2006
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Rask Ingemann Lambertsen, 16:39
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Rask Ingemann Lambertsen, 16:39
  • Re: make safe_read usable in a mixed C/C++ build, Jim Meyering, 16:32
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Denis Vlasenko, 11:30
  • make safe_read usable in a mixed C/C++ build, Bruno Haible, 10:45
  • canonicalize-lgpl: fix compilation error on mingw, Bruno Haible, 10:44
• December 22, 2006
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Denis Vlasenko, 18:45
  • ACL support for copy-file module, Bruno Haible, 13:55
  • Re: coreutils 6.6 fails to compile on IRIX 5.3, Bruno Haible, 12:42
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Andrew Pinski, 12:36
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Robert Dewar, 12:31
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Robert Dewar, 12:28
  • RE: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Andrew Pinski, 12:17
  • RE: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Dave Korn, 12:08
  • Re: [bug-gnulib] proposed patches to mbchar, mbswidth, wcwidth to use new wctype module, Bruno Haible, 11:36
  • Re: coreutils 6.6 fails to compile on IRIX 5.3, Bruno Haible, 11:27
  • gnulib-tool: use portable sed commands, Bruno Haible, 07:49
  • Re: new module no-c++, Bruno Haible, 07:47
  • Re: [PATCH]: multiple problem with the poll module, Yoann Vandoorselaere, 06:46
  • Re: [PATCH]: multiple problem with the poll module, Yoann Vandoorselaere, 06:41
  • Re: [PATCH]: multiple problem with the poll module, Yoann Vandoorselaere, 05:55
  • Re: [PATCH]: multiple problem with the poll module, Paolo Bonzini, 05:31
  • Re: [PATCH]: multiple problem with the poll module, Yoann Vandoorselaere, 05:25
  • Re: [PATCH]: multiple problem with the poll module, Paolo Bonzini, 04:48
  • Re: avoid integer overflow in mktime.m4, Paul Eggert, 03:56
  • Re: avoid integer overflow in mktime.m4, Paul Eggert, 03:50
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Paolo Bonzini, 03:20
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Paolo Bonzini, 02:59
• December 21, 2006
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Robert Dewar, 23:02
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Paul Brook, 21:57
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Gabriel Dos Reis, 21:48
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Robert Dewar, 21:06
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Paul Brook, 21:03
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Denis Vlasenko, 19:59
  • proposed patches to mbchar, mbswidth, wcwidth to use new wctype module, Paul Eggert, 19:35
  • Re: coreutils 6.6 fails to compile on IRIX 5.3, Paul Eggert, 19:29
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Paul Eggert, 18:45
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Joseph S. Myers, 18:14
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Ian Lance Taylor, 18:05
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Matthew Woehlke, 17:04
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Paul Eggert, 16:53
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Richard B. Kreckel, 15:47
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Joseph S. Myers, 15:26
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Paul Eggert, 14:32
  • Re: issue with getopt, Lorenzo Bettini, 11:44
  • Re: issue with getopt, Bruno Haible, 09:51
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Paolo Bonzini, 09:05
• December 20, 2006
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Robert Dewar, 23:21
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Ian Lance Taylor, 23:16
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Gabriel Dos Reis, 23:16
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Gabriel Dos Reis, 23:16
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Gabriel Dos Reis, 23:16
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Richard B. Kreckel, 23:16
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Seongbae Park, 23:16
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Richard B. Kreckel, 23:16
  • RE: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Dave Korn, 23:15
  • RE: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Dave Korn, 23:09
  • RE: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Dave Korn, 22:41
  • Re: [bug-gnulib] updating with gnulib-tool, Eric Blake, 22:30
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Marcin Dalecki, 18:48
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Matthew Woehlke, 18:07
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Marcin Dalecki, 17:42
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Andreas Schwab, 17:30
  • Re: [bug-gnulib] issue with getopt, Bruce Korb, 15:05
  • RE: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Dave Korn, 15:02
  • Re: [bug-gnulib] issue with getopt, Lorenzo Bettini, 14:47
  • Re: [bug-gnulib] updating with gnulib-tool, Lorenzo Bettini, 14:45
  • Re: [bug-gnulib] issue with getopt, Bruno Haible, 14:36
  • Re: [bug-gnulib] updating with gnulib-tool, Bruno Haible, 14:30
  • Re: [PATCH]: multiple problem with the poll module, Paolo Bonzini, 11:58
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Matthew Woehlke, 11:25
  • Re: [bug-gnulib] updating with gnulib-tool, Lorenzo Bettini, 10:40
  • Re: issue with getopt, Lorenzo Bettini, 10:21
  • Re: [bug-gnulib] updating with gnulib-tool, Bruno Haible, 09:48
  • Re: [bug-gnulib] updating with gnulib-tool, Ralf Wildenhues, 09:11
  • Re: [bug-gnulib] updating with gnulib-tool, Bruno Haible, 09:05
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? (was: avoid integer overflow in mktime.m4), Marcin Dalecki, 08:09
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Robert Dewar, 06:56
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Andrew Haley, 06:48
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Zdenek Dvorak, 06:46
  • Re: [bug-gnulib] updating with gnulib-tool, Lorenzo Bettini, 05:31
  • Re: [bug-gnulib] include in a C++ program, Lorenzo Bettini, 05:29
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Mike Stump, 00:54
  • RE: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Dave Korn, 00:54
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Andrew Pinski, 00:54
  • RE: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Dave Korn, 00:54
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? (was: avoid integer overflow in mktime.m4), Richard B. Kreckel, 00:54
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Paul Brook, 00:54
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Dorit Nuzman, 00:54
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Denis Vlasenko, 00:54
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Joe Buck, 00:54
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Paul Brook, 00:54
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Denis Vlasenko, 00:54
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Ian Lance Taylor, 00:54
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Joe Buck, 00:54
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Denis Vlasenko, 00:54
• December 19, 2006
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Robert Dewar, 22:28
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Robert Dewar, 22:27
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Robert Dewar, 21:17
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Robert Dewar, 21:15
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Robert Dewar, 21:13
  • Re: [bug-gnulib] GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Bruno Haible, 16:54
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Gabriel Dos Reis, 14:49
  • Re: [PATCH]: multiple problem with the poll module, Yoann Vandoorselaere, 14:23
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Andrew Haley, 14:05
  • Re: [bug-gnulib] updating with gnulib-tool, Bruno Haible, 13:49
  • Re: [bug-gnulib] include in a C++ program, Bruno Haible, 13:49
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Paul Eggert, 13:46
  • Re: [PATCH]: multiple problem with the poll module, Paul Eggert, 12:52
  • updating with gnulib-tool, Lorenzo Bettini, 09:55
  • Re: [bug-gnulib] include in a C++ program, Lorenzo Bettini, 09:51
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Robert Dewar, 08:49
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Robert Dewar, 08:47
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Joseph S. Myers, 08:45
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Joseph S. Myers, 08:45
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Joseph S. Myers, 08:45
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Robert Dewar, 08:41
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Florian Weimer, 08:40
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Paolo Bonzini, 08:39
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Florian Weimer, 08:37
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Robert Dewar, 08:34
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Robert Dewar, 08:08
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Zdenek Dvorak, 08:08
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Robert Dewar, 08:08
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Florian Weimer, 08:08
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Robert Dewar, 08:08
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Robert Dewar, 08:08
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Gabriel Dos Reis, 08:08
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Florian Weimer, 08:08
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Andrew Haley, 08:08
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Gabriel Dos Reis, 08:08
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Andrew Haley, 08:08
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Andrew Pinski, 08:08
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Robert Dewar, 08:08
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Robert Dewar, 08:08
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Andrew Haley, 08:08
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Robert Dewar, 08:08
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Robert Dewar, 08:08
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? (was: avoid integer overflow in mktime.m4), Andrew Pinski, 08:07
  • Re: [PATCH]: multiple problem with the poll module, Yoann Vandoorselaere, 05:49
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Paolo Bonzini, 05:45
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Paul Eggert, 04:44
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Paul Eggert, 04:36
  • Re: [PATCH]: multiple problem with the poll module, Paolo Bonzini, 04:29
  • Re: failure with HEAD: stdin seekable, Paul Eggert, 03:59
  • Re: failure with HEAD: stdin seekable, Jim Meyering, 03:54
  • Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?, Brooks Moses, 02:50
  • GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? (was: avoid integer overflow in mktime.m4), Ralf Wildenhues, 00:54
  • Re: failure with HEAD: stdin seekable, Eric Blake, 00:53
  • Re: savewd: fix module dependency on fcntl, Ralf Wildenhues, 00:39
• December 18, 2006
  • Re: avoid integer overflow in mktime.m4, Paul Eggert, 21:07
  • Re: savewd: fix module dependency on fcntl, Paul Eggert, 19:45
  • avoid integer overflow in mktime.m4, Ralf Wildenhues, 18:09
  • savewd: fix module dependency on fcntl, Ralf Wildenhues, 18:00
  • Re: Current coreutils HEAD does not compile, Andreas Schwab, 17:41
  • Re: Current coreutils HEAD does not compile, Paul Eggert, 17:29
  • [PATCH]: multiple problem with the poll module, Yoann Vandoorselaere, 15:39
  • gmane and gnulib-cvs, Karl Berry, 15:01
  • Re: Is / distinct from //?, gilmap, 14:01
  • Re: Is / distinct from //?, Paul Eggert, 13:10
  • Re: Is / distinct from //?, Paul Eggert, 13:07
  • Re: Is / distinct from //?, Eric Blake, 08:50
  • Re: Is / distinct from //?, Paul Eggert, 03:08
• December 16, 2006
  • Re: failure with HEAD: stdin seekable, Eric Blake, 14:42
• December 15, 2006
  • Re: why don't Gnulib tests run for me?, Ben Pfaff, 00:42
  • Re: why don't Gnulib tests run for me?, Ralf Wildenhues, 00:39
• December 14, 2006
  • why don't Gnulib tests run for me?, Ben Pfaff, 20:36
  • Re: openssl vs. libgcrypt, Werner Koch, 17:41
  • Re: openssl vs. libgcrypt, Logan Gabriel, 17:41
• December 13, 2006
  • Re: openssl vs. libgcrypt, Karl Berry, 18:41
  • Re: openssl vs. libgcrypt, Werner Koch, 12:31
  • Re: [Bug 204567] New: base64 -d doesn't accept base64 output, Jim Meyering, 09:58
• December 12, 2006
  • openssl vs. libgcrypt, Karl Berry, 14:11
  • Re: [bug-gnulib] include in a C++ program, Bruno Haible, 09:08
  • Re: iconv modules, Bruno Haible, 07:50
  • Re: openat problems on decent linux systems, Paul Eggert, 02:38
  • Re: openat problems on decent linux systems, Jim Meyering, 01:49
  • Re: openat problems on decent linux systems, Paul Eggert, 01:16
• December 11, 2006
  • Re: [bug-gnulib] include in a C++ program, Lorenzo Bettini, 17:13
  • Re: new module no-c++, Bruno Haible, 13:32
  • Re: [bug-gnulib] how many #includes?, Bruno Haible, 13:22
  • Re: [bug-gnulib] include in a C++ program, Bruno Haible, 13:18
  • Re: new module no-c++, Paul Eggert, 12:10
  • new module no-c++, Bruno Haible, 11:34
  • Re: [bug-gnulib] how many #includes?, Ralf Wildenhues, 10:45
  • Re: [bug-gnulib] how many #includes?, Bruno Haible, 10:23
• December 10, 2006
  • Re: issue with getopt, Eric Blake, 16:27
  • issue with getopt, Lorenzo Bettini, 12:43
• December 09, 2006
  • include in a C++ program, Lorenzo Bettini, 16:13
  • Re: coreutils-6.7: one minor problem on two systems, Jim Meyering, 02:49
• December 08, 2006
  • Re: struct timespec on NSK (FYI), Paul Eggert, 20:39
  • Re: struct timespec on NSK (FYI), Matthew Woehlke, 19:53
  • Re: struct timespec on NSK (FYI), Paul Eggert, 17:23
  • struct timespec on NSK (FYI), Matthew Woehlke, 14:32
  • FYI: announce-gen: use time-stamp in place of $Revision:...$, Jim Meyering, 12:40
  • two new options for the announce-gen script, Jim Meyering, 04:29
• December 06, 2006
  • Re: gzip 1.3.6 broken on Tandem NSK/OSS, Paul Eggert, 20:53
  • Re: gzip 1.3.6 broken on Tandem NSK/OSS, Matthew Woehlke, 17:57
  • Re: gzip 1.3.6 broken on Tandem NSK/OSS, Paul Eggert, 16:57
  • Re: converting gnulib: cvs to git, Bruno Haible, 13:26
  • Re: gzip 1.3.6 broken on Tandem NSK/OSS, Matthew Woehlke, 10:58
• December 05, 2006
  • Re: gzip 1.3.6 broken on Tandem NSK/OSS, Paul Eggert, 23:08
  • Re: Fix test-argp-2.sh test failure, Ralf Wildenhues, 17:14
  • Re: converting gnulib: cvs to git, Nix, 14:58
  • Re: gzip 1.3.6 (and other recent releases): utime() operation missed or clobbered at output file close, Paul Eggert, 13:16
  • Re: converting gnulib: cvs to git, Ralf Wildenhues, 02:38
• December 04, 2006
  • Re: converting gnulib: cvs to git, Karl Berry, 17:39
  • Re: converting gnulib: cvs to git, Simon Josefsson, 17:31
  • Re: converting gnulib: cvs to git, Jim Meyering, 17:26
  • Re: converting gnulib: cvs to git, Simon Josefsson, 17:21
  • Re: converting gnulib: cvs to git, Karl Berry, 17:19
  • Re: converting gnulib: cvs to git, Karl Berry, 17:19
  • Re: converting gnulib: cvs to git, Bob Proulx, 16:47
  • Re: converting gnulib: cvs to git, Jim Meyering, 14:38
  • Re: converting gnulib: cvs to git, Ralf Wildenhues, 14:31
  • Re: converting gnulib: cvs to git, Paul Eggert, 14:14
  • Re: [Georg Schwarz] Re: coreutils 6.6 fails to compile on IRIX 5.3, Georg Schwarz, 13:44
  • Re: converting gnulib: cvs to git, Simon Josefsson, 11:14
  • converting gnulib: cvs to git, Jim Meyering, 04:21
  • Re: [Georg Schwarz] Re: coreutils 6.6 fails to compile on IRIX 5.3, Paul Eggert, 04:16
  • [Georg Schwarz] Re: coreutils 6.6 fails to compile on IRIX 5.3, Jim Meyering, 03:03
  • Re: coreutils 6.6 fails to compile on IRIX 5.3, Paul Eggert, 02:04
• December 03, 2006
  • Re: coreutils 6.6 fails to compile on IRIX 5.3, Jim Meyering, 14:02
  • Re: the -x option of du misbehaves depending on arguments, Jim Meyering, 05:34
• December 02, 2006
  • Re: gnulib broken on systems lacking fchdir, Jim Meyering, 07:26
  • Re: Autobuild of gnulib, Simon Josefsson, 05:55
• December 01, 2006
  • Re: gnulib broken on systems lacking fchdir, Paul Eggert, 19:44
  • Re: gif patents on GNU web pages, Karl Berry, 19:09
  • Re: gnulib broken on systems lacking fchdir, Karl Berry, 19:08
  • Re: Autobuild of gnulib, Jim Meyering, 17:27
  • Re: Autobuild of gnulib, Simon Josefsson, 16:56
  • Autobuild of gnulib, Simon Josefsson, 16:52
  • Re: switching gnulib from CVS to a dVCS, James Youngman, 12:59
  • Re: [bug-gnulib] gnulib broken on systems lacking fchdir, Bruno Haible, 08:41
  • Re: gnulib broken on systems lacking fchdir, Jim Meyering, 05:22
  • Re: gnulib broken on systems lacking fchdir, Jim Meyering, 05:16
  • Re: gif patents on GNU web pages, Simon Josefsson, 04:51

---

[Prev Period]

[Next Period]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc