[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Building m4 on BSDI 4.0.1
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
Re: Building m4 on BSDI 4.0.1 |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Jan 2007 23:13:13 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.9) Gecko/20061207 Thunderbird/1.5.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.4.666 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
According to Chris McGuire on 1/12/2007 7:55 PM:
> That was it, worked fine!
>
Hooray - the gnulib wchar module has seen its first happy customer. I'll
check in the remaining m4 patches shortly; I've been camping on the ss_sp
vs. ss_base patch for almost a month now. And it is one step closer to a
release of M4 1.4.9.
>
> Thanks again... if you need me to try anything else, just let me know.
Can you run 'make check' to validate that everything built okay?
>
> Also, how will this manifest itself to other software packages? What I mean
> is, it is up to each author to include a newer version that detects this bug,
> or is this a universal fix that should trickle down quickly to other open
> source packages? I'm sure that was a dumb question, but I think you get what
> I'm asking. :)
Any GNU project that uses gnulib and is released on some date after today
will automatically be fixed. See the current list of gnulib clients here:
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/gnulib/users.txt?rev=1.13&root=gnulib&view=auto
Other software packages will likely still encounter problems if they try
to use your broken <wchar.h> without the correct prerequisite headers.
- --
Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well!
Eric Blake address@hidden
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)
Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFFqHh484KuGfSFAYARAioIAJ9susYqW/gpNhlGlYw9AZKkfH7Y9QCgt373
KM+bxFdscPuw+xMPMfPewvA=
=BJjF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Re: Building m4 on BSDI 4.0.1, (continued)
- Re: Building m4 on BSDI 4.0.1, Eric Blake, 2007/01/10
- Re: Building m4 on BSDI 4.0.1, Eric Blake, 2007/01/10
- Re: Building m4 on BSDI 4.0.1, Eric Blake, 2007/01/11
- Re: Building m4 on BSDI 4.0.1, Paul Eggert, 2007/01/11
- Re: Building m4 on BSDI 4.0.1, Eric Blake, 2007/01/12
- Re: Building m4 on BSDI 4.0.1, Bruno Haible, 2007/01/12
- Re: Building m4 on BSDI 4.0.1, Eric Blake, 2007/01/13
- Re: Building m4 on BSDI 4.0.1, Paul Eggert, 2007/01/12
Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Building m4 on BSDI 4.0.1,
Eric Blake <=