Re: stdint and cygwin bug

[Paul Eggert]

Eric Blake <address@hidden> writes:

> cygwin currently defines wint_t as unsigned int (legal per POSIX), but then 
> tries to use INT_MIN and INT_MAX for WINT_MIN and WINT_MAX.  I've reported 
> this 
> as a bug to the cygwin list.  In the meantime, is it worth fixing the stdint 
> module to detect this brokenness, and redefine WINT_MIN and MAX to their 
> correct values in this case?

If Cygwin fixes it quickly (and why wouldn't they?) then I wouldn't
bother, but I don't use Cygwin so I'm probably not the best person to
ask.