[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Add 'Required Tools' to README?
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: Add 'Required Tools' to README? |
Date: |
Wed, 4 Apr 2007 13:14:17 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.4 |
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > * GNU autoconf 2.59 or newer.
> [...]
> > * GNU automake 1.10 or newer.
>
> This does not make sense. Automake-1.10 requires Autoconf-2.60 or newer.
Yup. Thanks, only automake-1.9.6 should be the minimum requirement. Also
some "good English" tweaks:
--- DEPENDENCIES 4 Apr 2007 02:45:49 -0000 1.3
+++ DEPENDENCIES 4 Apr 2007 11:11:56 -0000
@@ -1,16 +1,18 @@
The following packages are needed by maintainers for using 'gnulib-tool':
* A C runtime and compiler.
- + Mandatory, platform cc gives good portability exposure.
- + GCC Homepage (GNU gcc 2.95 or newer):
+ + Mandatory. Using the platform's native 'cc' gives good portability
+ exposure, but you can also use GNU gcc 2.95 or newer.
+ + GCC Homepage:
http://gcc.gnu.org/
+ Download:
http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gcc/
ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gcc/
* A 'make' utility.
- + Mandatory, platform make gives good portability exposure for
- in-tree builds, but VPATH builds require GNU make 3.79.1 or newer.
+ + Mandatory. Using the platform's native 'make' gives good portability
+ exposure for in-tree builds, but VPATH builds require GNU make 3.79.1 or
+ newer.
+ GNU Make Homepage:
http://www.gnu.org/software/make/
+ Download:
@@ -18,7 +20,7 @@
ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/make/
* GNU m4 1.4.5 or newer.
- + 1.4.5 or newer is mandatory, but recommend 1.4.9 or newer.
+ + 1.4.5 or newer is mandatory, but 1.4.9 or newer is recommended.
+ Homepage:
http://www.gnu.org/software/m4/
+ Download:
@@ -33,7 +35,7 @@
http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/autoconf/
ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/autoconf/
-* GNU automake 1.10 or newer.
+* GNU automake 1.9.6 or newer.
+ Mandatory.
+ Homepage:
http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/
- Re: list of portable tools, (continued)
- Re: list of portable tools (was: Add 'Required Tools' to README?), Bruno Haible, 2007/04/05
- Re: Add 'Required Tools' to README?, Bruno Haible, 2007/04/04
- Re: gzip vs. bzip2, Bruno Haible, 2007/04/04
- Re: gzip vs. bzip2, Matthew Woehlke, 2007/04/05
- Re: Add 'Required Tools' to README?, Bruno Haible, 2007/04/04
- Re: Add 'Required Tools' to README?, Paul Eggert, 2007/04/04
- Re: Add 'Required Tools' to README?, Ralf Wildenhues, 2007/04/04
- Re: Add 'Required Tools' to README?,
Bruno Haible <=