[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: operations on FILE streams
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: operations on FILE streams |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Apr 2007 12:12:32 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Bruno Haible <address@hidden> writes:
> Interesting that Solaris has all these. Yes I think such modules would be
> useful in gnulib. Except that the gnulib function names should not have a
> '__' prefix, since '__' is in the system's namespace.
But the function names use leading __ in both Solaris and glibc, and I
expect that if they are ever standardized they'll be standardized with
the leading __. So for this particular case I suggest using names
with leading __, at least in user code, as that will keep the code
more portable. Gnulib can do "#define __fpurge rpl__fpurge" if
necessary (which I don't think will be needed).
- 'fflush' test failure on Cygwin, Bruno Haible, 2007/04/12
- Re: 'fflush' test failure on Cygwin, Eric Blake, 2007/04/12
- Re: operations on FILE streams, Bruno Haible, 2007/04/13
- Re: operations on FILE streams,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: operations on FILE streams, Bruno Haible, 2007/04/13
- Re: operations on FILE streams, Eric Blake-1, 2007/04/13
- Re: operations on FILE streams, Bruno Haible, 2007/04/13
- Re: operations on FILE streams, Paul Eggert, 2007/04/13
- Re: operations on FILE streams, Bruno Haible, 2007/04/13
- Re: 'fflush' test failure on Cygwin, Eric Blake, 2007/04/16
- Re: 'fflush' test failure on Cygwin, Bruno Haible, 2007/04/23
- Re: 'fflush' test failure on Cygwin, Eric Blake, 2007/04/23
- new module 'fseeko', Bruno Haible, 2007/04/25
- Re: new module 'fseeko', Eric Blake, 2007/04/25