Re: Multiple definition of gnulib symbols

[Bruno Haible]

Simon Josefsson wrote:
> > ... except for gc_hash_hmac_setkey.
> 
> Would implementing that function in gc-gnulib.c solve the problem?

Maybe. Maybe the problem was a difference between two different versions
of gnulib; then it will not solve the problem.

> Perhaps there should be some #define's happening, mapping the
> function names to gnulib_gc_* or into libgcrypt_gc_*, and have the files
> implement those symbols.

Possibly; it's up to you to decide.

> I'm wondering if that will be sufficient.  When is the namespace change
> hack that you mentioned Ralf identified necessary?

Basically, any time you publish a library (whether shared or static, doesn't
matter) that contains portions of gnulib.

Bruno