[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: no new modules 'freading', 'fwriting'
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: no new modules 'freading', 'fwriting' |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Apr 2007 12:56:48 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.4 |
Eric Blake wrote:
> I'm checking this in now, since I needed it to fix fflush on mingw (see
> next email).
Thanks. This was hard to understand, so I'm adding some comments.
2007-04-27 Bruno Haible <address@hidden>
* lib/fflush.c: Add comments.
* modules/fpurge-tests (Depends-on): Add fflush.
* modules/freadable-tests (Depends-on): Likewise.
* modules/fwritable-tests (Depends-on): Likewise.
*** lib/fflush.c 26 Apr 2007 13:20:51 -0000 1.6
--- lib/fflush.c 27 Apr 2007 10:28:32 -0000
***************
*** 38,48 ****
int result;
off_t pos;
! /* When stream is NULL, POSIX only requires flushing of output
! streams. C89 guarantees behavior of output streams, and fflush
! should be safe on read-write streams that are not currently
! reading. */
! if (! stream || ! freading (stream))
return fflush (stream);
/* POSIX does not specify fflush behavior for non-seekable input
--- 38,61 ----
int result;
off_t pos;
! /* When stream is NULL, POSIX and C99 only require flushing of "output
! streams and update streams in which the most recent operation was not
! input", and all implementations do this.
!
! When stream is "an output stream or an update stream in which the most
! recent operation was not input", POSIX and C99 requires that fflush
! writes out any buffered data, and all implementations do this.
!
! When stream is, however, an input stream or an update stream in which
! the most recent operation was input, POSIX and C99 specify nothing.
! mingw, in particular, drops the input buffer, leaving the file descriptor
! positioned at the end of the input buffer. I.e. ftell (stream) is lost.
! We don't want to call the implementation's fflush in this case.
!
! We test ! freading (stream) here, rather than fwriting (stream), because
! what we need to know is whether the stream holds a "read buffer", and on
! mingw this is indicated by _IOREAD, regardless of _IOWRT. */
! if (stream == NULL || ! freading (stream))
return fflush (stream);
/* POSIX does not specify fflush behavior for non-seekable input
***************
*** 60,71 ****
--- 73,88 ----
result = fpurge (stream);
if (result != 0)
return result;
+
pos = lseek (fileno (stream), pos, SEEK_SET);
if (pos == -1)
return EOF;
+ /* After a successful lseek, update the file descriptor's position cache
+ in the stream. */
#if defined __sferror /* FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD, MacOS X,
Cygwin */
stream->_offset = pos;
stream->_flags |= __SOFF;
#endif
+
return 0;
}
*** modules/fpurge-tests 16 Apr 2007 15:02:36 -0000 1.2
--- modules/fpurge-tests 27 Apr 2007 10:28:33 -0000
***************
*** 2,7 ****
--- 2,8 ----
tests/test-fpurge.c
Depends-on:
+ fflush
configure.ac:
*** modules/freadable-tests 14 Apr 2007 00:11:41 -0000 1.1
--- modules/freadable-tests 27 Apr 2007 10:28:33 -0000
***************
*** 2,7 ****
--- 2,8 ----
tests/test-freadable.c
Depends-on:
+ fflush
configure.ac:
*** modules/fwritable-tests 14 Apr 2007 00:15:48 -0000 1.1
--- modules/fwritable-tests 27 Apr 2007 10:28:33 -0000
***************
*** 2,7 ****
--- 2,8 ----
tests/test-fwritable.c
Depends-on:
+ fflush
configure.ac:
- no new modules 'freading', 'fwriting', Bruno Haible, 2007/04/13
- Re: no new modules 'freading', 'fwriting', Eric Blake, 2007/04/25
- Re: no new modules 'freading', 'fwriting', Eric Blake, 2007/04/26
- Re: no new modules 'freading', 'fwriting', Bruno Haible, 2007/04/28
- Re: no new modules 'freading', 'fwriting', Bruno Haible, 2007/04/29
- Re: no new modules 'freading', 'fwriting', Bruno Haible, 2007/04/29
- Re: no new modules 'freading', 'fwriting', Bruno Haible, 2007/04/29