[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: M4 1.4.9b testsuite failure
From: |
Andreas Schwab |
Subject: |
Re: M4 1.4.9b testsuite failure |
Date: |
Thu, 31 May 2007 14:32:58 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.97 (gnu/linux) |
Bruno Haible <address@hidden> writes:
> The purpose of the test is not to create a signalling NaN (despite the
> comment saying so).
All evidence is against this interpretation.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, address@hidden
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
- Re: M4 1.4.9b testsuite failure, (continued)
- Re: M4 1.4.9b testsuite failure, Andreas Schwab, 2007/05/30
- Re: M4 1.4.9b testsuite failure, Bruno Haible, 2007/05/30
- Re: M4 1.4.9b testsuite failure, Andreas Schwab, 2007/05/31
- Re: M4 1.4.9b testsuite failure, Bruno Haible, 2007/05/31
- Re: M4 1.4.9b testsuite failure, Andreas Schwab, 2007/05/31
- Re: M4 1.4.9b testsuite failure, Bruno Haible, 2007/05/31
- Re: M4 1.4.9b testsuite failure, Andreas Schwab, 2007/05/31
- Re: M4 1.4.9b testsuite failure, Andreas Schwab, 2007/05/30
- Re: M4 1.4.9b testsuite failure, Andreas Schwab, 2007/05/30