[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: xstrtol.h
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
Re: xstrtol.h |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Jul 2007 09:03:37 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.5) Gecko/20070716 Thunderbird/2.0.0.5 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
According to Bruno Haible on 7/22/2007 5:03 AM:
>
> It is clearer what the message is referring to. And also --skip-bytes is a
> string that does not require translation, therefore the macro invocation
> actually can read
>
> STRTOL_FATAL_ERROR (optarg, "--skip-bytes", s_err);
>
> All uses of STRTOL_FATAL_ERROR are in this category:
>
> ./src/od.c: STRTOL_FATAL_ERROR (optarg, _("skip argument"), s_err);
> --skip-bytes argument
CVS head m4 also uses xstrtol for --nesting-limit and --debuglen, so a
patch along these lines will benefit the translation of multiple packages.
>
> I can prepare a patch for this; just let me know whether for
> $ od -j -1
> you would see the error message
> od: invalid --skip-bytes argument `-1'
> or
> od: invalid `-j' argument `-1'
I would prefer the long option name.
- --
Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well!
Eric Blake address@hidden
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)
Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGo3HJ84KuGfSFAYARApSbAJ9PbSI4iT/07U0pOzq6oPUv6/TDeQCfU0Gu
Urj/wibhBqgprMv1HUhd4nQ=
=vRa8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Re: POTFILES.in updates?, (continued)
- Re: POTFILES.in updates?, Bruno Haible, 2007/07/19
- Re: POTFILES.in updates?, Eric Blake, 2007/07/19
- Re: xstrtol.h (was: Re: POTFILES.in updates?), Bruno Haible, 2007/07/21
- Re: xstrtol.h, Jim Meyering, 2007/07/21
- Re: xstrtol.h, Bruno Haible, 2007/07/22
- Re: xstrtol.h,
Eric Blake <=
- Re: xstrtol.h, Jim Meyering, 2007/07/22
- Re: xstrtol.h, Ben Pfaff, 2007/07/22
- Re: xstrtol.h, Jim Meyering, 2007/07/22
- Re: xstrtol.h, Jim Meyering, 2007/07/22
- Re: xstrtol.h, Jim Meyering, 2007/07/22
- Re: xstrtol.h, Bruno Haible, 2007/07/25
- human interface change?!? [Re: xstrtol.h, Jim Meyering, 2007/07/26
- Re: human interface change?!? [Re: xstrtol.h, Bruno Haible, 2007/07/26
- Re: human interface change?!? [Re: xstrtol.h, Jim Meyering, 2007/07/26
Re: POTFILES.in updates?, Eric Blake, 2007/07/19