[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gnulib request
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: gnulib request |
Date: |
Mon, 1 Oct 2007 23:54:52 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.4 |
Sean Boudreau wrote:
> They're non standard and present challenges in the portability department
> so if they aren't needed the less they're referenced the better.
I agree with you. We considered this point. (For example, there is a way
to implement the 'close-stream' module with fpending and one without.)
But in the case of fflush & fseek, these additional low-level functions appear
to be really needed.
Bruno
- Re: gnulib request, Sean Boudreau, 2007/10/01
- Re: gnulib request,
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: gnulib request, Sean Boudreau, 2007/10/02
- QNX and stdio extension modules (was: Re: gnulib request), Bruno Haible, 2007/10/02
- Re: QNX and stdio extension modules (was: Re: gnulib request), Sean Boudreau, 2007/10/03
- Re: QNX and stdio extension modules (was: Re: gnulib request), Eric Blake, 2007/10/03
- Re: QNX and stdio extension modules (was: Re: gnulib request), Bruno Haible, 2007/10/03
- Re: QNX and stdio extension modules (was: Re: gnulib request), Sean Boudreau, 2007/10/03
- Re: QNX and stdio extension modules (was: Re: gnulib request), Bruno Haible, 2007/10/03