[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LGPLv2.5
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: LGPLv2.5 |
Date: |
Tue, 2 Oct 2007 00:57:02 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.4 |
Hi Karl,
> 2) Assuming that is not imminent, we are contemplating changing the
> licensing for most gnulib files to GPLv3+/LGPLv3+. Any reactions?
This is unrelated to LGPLv2.5. (I shouldn't have mentioned the two independent
topics in a single mail; my bad.)
If LGPLv2.5 comes to exist, it may replace some of our uses of LGPLv2+.
We are moving to LGPLv3+ only those parts of gnulib where we consider
that GPLv2 compatibility is not desired; in these cases LGPLv2.5 has no
advantage over LGPLv3+.
Bruno
- LGPLv2.5, Karl Berry, 2007/10/01
- Re: LGPLv2.5,
Bruno Haible <=