Re: @FOO@ vs. $(FOO)

bug-gnulib

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: @FOO@ vs. $(FOO)

From:	Bruno Haible
Subject:	Re: @FOO@ vs. $(FOO)
Date:	Fri, 19 Oct 2007 12:52:35 +0200
User-agent:	KMail/1.5.4

Jim Meyering wrote:
> In that vein, you may want to change your modules:
> 
>   modules/csharpexec:DEFS += -DEXEEXT=\"$(EXEEXT)\"
>   modules/javaexec:DEFS += -DEXEEXT=\"$(EXEEXT)\"
>   modules/relocatable-prog:DEFS += -DEXEEXT=\"$(EXEEXT)\"

Done.
http://git.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=gnulib.git;a=commitdiff;h=723e191a290b675e77dfc6bb82d444dc2acb807c

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

filenamecat-tests, Eric Blake, 2007/10/18
- Re: filenamecat-tests, Jim Meyering, 2007/10/18
  - Re: filenamecat-tests, Eric Blake, 2007/10/18
  - Re: filenamecat-tests, Ralf Wildenhues, 2007/10/18
  - @FOO@ vs. $(FOO) (was: Re: filenamecat-tests), Bruno Haible, 2007/10/18
    - Re: @FOO@ vs. $(FOO), Jim Meyering, 2007/10/19
    - Re: @FOO@ vs. $(FOO), Bruno Haible <=

Prev by Date: Re: vasnprintf's "%n in writable segment" chokes with _FORTIFY_SOURCE == 2
Next by Date: Re: vasnprintf's "%n in writable segment" chokes with _FORTIFY_SOURCE == 2
Previous by thread: Re: @FOO@ vs. $(FOO)
Next by thread: regex cannot be compiled with g++
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread