[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: profile-directed optimizations
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: profile-directed optimizations |
Date: |
Sun, 21 Sep 2008 17:35:20 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.4 |
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > Says the GCC 4.3.0 doc.
>
> My experience is different. In fact, in 4.4.0 it will even use it for
> instruction selection in some cases.
Then it's a doc bug. The GCC doc in svn (invoke.texi line 6589) says about the
effects of -fprofile-use:
The following options are enabled: `-fbranch-probabilities',
`-fvpt', `-funroll-loops', `-fpeel-loops', `-ftracer'
If inlining is also affected, the doc should say so.
Bruno
- Re: msgmerge speedup: fstrcmp and diffseq improvements, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: msgmerge speedup: fstrcmp and diffseq improvements, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/09/15
- Re: msgmerge speedup: fstrcmp and diffseq improvements, Bruno Haible, 2008/09/15
- Re: msgmerge speedup: fstrcmp and diffseq improvements, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/09/19
- Re: msgmerge speedup: fstrcmp and diffseq improvements, Bruno Haible, 2008/09/20
- Re: msgmerge speedup: fstrcmp and diffseq improvements, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/09/20
- Re: msgmerge speedup: fstrcmp and diffseq improvements, Paolo Bonzini, 2008/09/21
- Re: profile-directed optimization, Bruno Haible, 2008/09/21
- Re: profile-directed optimization, Paolo Bonzini, 2008/09/21
- Re: profile-directed optimizations, Bruno Haible, 2008/09/21
- Re: profile-directed optimizations, Paolo Bonzini, 2008/09/21
- Re: profile-directed optimizations,
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: msgmerge speedup: fstrcmp and diffseq improvements, Bruno Haible, 2008/09/22