[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ls -v is still inconsistent
From: |
Kamil Dudka |
Subject: |
Re: ls -v is still inconsistent |
Date: |
Fri, 20 Mar 2009 13:24:14 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.7 |
On Friday 20 of March 2009 12:36:38 Bruno Haible wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
> > Perhaps "~" isn't the only character we should treat that way.
>
> I'd say that '~' is pretty special here because it's used as backup file
> suffix by many text editors. Which is not the case for '_', '-', and
> others.
Definitely. The main difference is that '_' and (especially) '-' are version
number's separators, we can't easy cut them off. AFAIK '~' is never used as
a version separator.
But it's sort of optimization problem. If anybody has a better idea about
the regular expression, send it to me. I'll compare it with the current
implementation and other known implementations and send you the result.
Kamil
- ls -v is still inconsistent, Sven Joachim, 2009/03/20
- Re: ls -v is still inconsistent, Kamil Dudka, 2009/03/20
- Re: ls -v is still inconsistent, Jim Meyering, 2009/03/20
- Re: ls -v is still inconsistent, Bruno Haible, 2009/03/20
- Re: ls -v is still inconsistent,
Kamil Dudka <=
- Re: ls -v is still inconsistent, Bob Proulx, 2009/03/20
- Re: ls -v is still inconsistent, Kamil Dudka, 2009/03/20
- Re: ls -v is still inconsistent, Kamil Dudka, 2009/03/23
- Re: ls -v is still inconsistent, Bob Proulx, 2009/03/23
Re: ls -v is still inconsistent, Bruno Haible, 2009/03/20
Re: ls -v is still inconsistent, Jim Meyering, 2009/03/24