[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] mktime & nanosleep: make sure SIGALRM is not blocked
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] mktime & nanosleep: make sure SIGALRM is not blocked |
Date: |
Tue, 19 May 2009 13:08:37 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.9 |
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> we're of course trying to
> figure out who is blocking the signal in the first place, but it isnt exactly
> a trivial affair when it crops up on some users systems and they cant always
> reproduce it.
Yes, I know that on Gentoo systems, many reported bugs can never be closed
because they cannot be reproduced on other Gentoo systems. Still, the rule is:
file a bug report with the program that is buggy.
> i'm not talking about all programs. i'm talking about the common ones i keep
> fielding bug reports for (gnulib). in the process,
I understand that it is easier to file a bug report about 'configure' files
than about other programs like 'inetd', because 'configure' operates in a more
transparent way (logging output, config.log, config.status). But that's not a
reason for claiming that 'configure' is buggy when the bug is elsewhere.
Instead, you should make the other program more transparent (through logging or
tracing features).
Bruno