Re: relax strchrnul to LGPLv2+?

[Jim Meyering]

Eric Blake wrote:
> According to Jim Meyering on 9/8/2009 3:17 AM:
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> I would like to use strchrnul in libvirt, but its license is
>> listed at the default "LGPL" (as glibc-derived, I guess?)
>> and that conflicts with libvirt's requirement for LGPLv2+.
>>
>> What do you think about relaxing it?
>
> Done.

Thanks!

As I tried to use that module in libvirt, I now see that its
dependent module, rawmemchr (also LGPL) needs the same treatment.
So, if you would, ...