[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: canonicalize-lgpl bug
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: canonicalize-lgpl bug |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Sep 2009 22:28:22 +0200 |
Eric Blake wrote:
> According to Eric Blake on 9/16/2009 10:10 PM:
>> According to Eric Blake on 9/16/2009 9:11 AM:
>>>> I've reached this point in reading the patches.
>>>> So far they look fine.
>>>> I will read the remainder, and test tomorrow.
>>> I'll try and rebase my series before then.
>>
>> Now rebased:
>>
>> git pull git://repo.or.cz/gnulib/ericb.git canonicalize
Very nice.
I spotted only this tiny nit:
In your "canonicalize, canonicalize-lgpl: use <stdlib.h>" patch's log:
-"canonicalize.h" because canonicalize_filename_mode is not glibc.
+"canonicalize.h" because canonicalize_filename_mode is not in glibc.
- Re: canonicalize-lgpl bug, (continued)
- Re: canonicalize-lgpl bug, Jim Meyering, 2009/09/10
- Re: canonicalize-lgpl bug, Eric Blake, 2009/09/10
- Re: canonicalize-lgpl bug, Jim Meyering, 2009/09/11
- Re: canonicalize-lgpl bug, Eric Blake, 2009/09/11
- Re: canonicalize-lgpl bug, Eric Blake, 2009/09/11
- Re: canonicalize-lgpl bug, Jim Meyering, 2009/09/16
- Re: canonicalize-lgpl bug, Eric Blake, 2009/09/16
- Re: canonicalize-lgpl bug, Eric Blake, 2009/09/17
- Re: canonicalize-lgpl bug, Eric Blake, 2009/09/17
- Re: canonicalize-lgpl bug,
Jim Meyering <=
- Re: canonicalize-lgpl bug, Jim Meyering, 2009/09/18
- Re: canonicalize-lgpl bug, Eric Blake, 2009/09/18