[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: doc update
From: |
Simon Josefsson |
Subject: |
Re: doc update |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:03:34 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) |
Eric Blake <address@hidden> writes:
> According to Simon Josefsson on 11/25/2009 2:43 AM:
>> Bruno Haible <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> This doc update considers that MacOS X 10.5 has most of the *_l functions
>>> that
>>> take a locale_t argument.
>> ...
>>> -This function is missing on all non-glibc platforms:
>>> +This function is missing on many platforms:
>>> MacOS X 10.3, FreeBSD 6.0, NetBSD 3.0, OpenBSD 3.8, AIX 5.1, HP-UX 11,
>>> IRIX 6.5, OSF/1 5.1, Solaris 10, Cygwin, mingw, Interix 3.5, BeOS.
>>
>> That is a bit open-ended, isn't it?
>
> The "all non-glibc platforms" is what was open-ended (because it precludes
> the idea that someone else will implement it).
>
> Personally, I'm okay with "is missing on many platforms", followed by the
> list (which we can then tweak over time to list the last known buggy
> versions as other implementations start to add POSIX 2008 compliance). So
> I think Bruno's patch was right, and there is no need to make a pass
> through just for rewording it again.
My patch didn't illustrate my point correctly: my point was that,
according to Bruno (and my checks), we do know that at least Mac OS X
10.5 implements the *_l functions, so arguable our documentation should
say that.
/Simon
- doc update, Bruno Haible, 2009/11/24
- Re: doc update, Simon Josefsson, 2009/11/25
- Re: doc update, Eric Blake, 2009/11/25
- Re: doc update, Bruno Haible, 2009/11/25
- Re: doc update, Simon Josefsson, 2009/11/26
- Re: symbols x platforms matrix, Bruno Haible, 2009/11/26
- Re: symbols x platforms matrix, Simon Josefsson, 2009/11/26
- Re: symbols x platforms matrix, Eric Blake, 2009/11/26
- Re: symbols x platforms matrix, Michael Haubenwallner, 2009/11/26