Re: portability to Windows CE?

[Paolo Bonzini]

> I'm being told that there is a free development environment called CeGCC [2].
> Both the Microsoft development environment and this one provide only a
> rudimentary C library: according to [3] it has even less functions than
> Windows, namely:
>    - no<assert.h>
>    - no<errno.h>
>    - no<fcntl.h>
>    - no<locale.h>
>    - no<signal.h>
>    - no<time.h>
>
> Care or don't care?

I'm seriously thinking of forking Wine's MSVCRT + gnulib's code to 
provide a decent native libc for Windows.  That would support Windows CE 
of course.

Having time for it, of course, is a different story...

Paolo