[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gl_* check do nothing?
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: gl_* check do nothing? |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Sep 2010 18:42:16 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.9 |
Sam Steingold wrote:
> ==========================
> gl_FUNC_STRERROR
> gl_STRING_MODULE_INDICATOR([strerror])
> ==========================
>
> print NOTHING.
gl_STRING_MODULE_INDICATOR - look at how it's defined in m4/string_h.m4 - only
sets some variable and arranges for some #define in config.h. It never prints
anything.
gl_FUNC_STRERROR - look at m4/strerror.m4 - prints nothing if previous tests
have already determined that errno.h must define additional errno values.
> So, does this mean that gnulib NEVER relies on the system-supplied strftime,
> strptime, getdate, strerror?
strftime: See
<http://www.gnu.org/software/gnulib/manual/html_node/strftime.html>
The gnulib module 'strftime' does not define a function named strftime(), but
nstrftime().
strptime: See
<http://www.gnu.org/software/gnulib/manual/html_node/strptime.html>
and m4/strptime.m4. It does an AC_CHECK_FUNCS_ONCE([strptime])
but you did not see it there because all AC_CHECK_FUNCS_ONCE invocations are
handled near the beginning of the 'configure' run.
getdate: never supplied by the system.
strerror: See above.
Bruno
- gl_* check do nothing?, Sam Steingold, 2010/09/29
- Re: gl_* check do nothing?, Eric Blake, 2010/09/29
- Re: gl_* check do nothing?,
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: gl_* check do nothing?, Sam Steingold, 2010/09/29
- Re: gl_* check do nothing?, Eric Blake, 2010/09/29
- Re: gl_* check do nothing?, Eric Blake, 2010/09/29
- Re: gl_* check do nothing?, Sam Steingold, 2010/09/29
- Re: gl_* check do nothing?, Eric Blake, 2010/09/29
- Re: gl_* check do nothing?, Sam Steingold, 2010/09/29
- Re: getdate module, Bruno Haible, 2010/09/29