[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: HAVE_STDBOOL_H, AC_HEADER_STDBOOL, and AM_STDBOOL_H
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: HAVE_STDBOOL_H, AC_HEADER_STDBOOL, and AM_STDBOOL_H |
Date: |
Tue, 01 Feb 2011 09:39:45 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7 |
On 02/01/11 07:58, Eric Blake wrote:
> I've already spent too long writing this email
Oh my yes. But how about another alternative:
in Autoconf, split AC_HEADER_STDBOOL into two pieces.
The large piece (with a new name) would be identical to
what's in gl_HEADER_STDBOOL. The small piece, still named
AC_HEADER_STDBOOL, would invoke the gl_HEADER_STDBOOL-equivalent,
and would also set HAVE_STDBOOL_H.
This wouldn't affect existing Autoconf usage, and would
allow us to keep Autoconf in sync with gnulib as far as
gl_HEADER_STDBOOL's contents go. I am less optimistic
that gl_HEADER_STDBOOL's contents won't need further changes,
given that MSVC still doesn't support stdbool, and may
support it in the future.
- Re: HAVE_STDBOOL_H, AC_HEADER_STDBOOL, and AM_STDBOOL_H, Simon Josefsson, 2011/02/01
- Re: HAVE_STDBOOL_H, AC_HEADER_STDBOOL, and AM_STDBOOL_H, Ralf Corsepius, 2011/02/01
- Re: HAVE_STDBOOL_H, AC_HEADER_STDBOOL, and AM_STDBOOL_H, Eric Blake, 2011/02/01
- Re: HAVE_STDBOOL_H, AC_HEADER_STDBOOL, and AM_STDBOOL_H, Ralf Corsepius, 2011/02/01
- Re: HAVE_STDBOOL_H, AC_HEADER_STDBOOL, and AM_STDBOOL_H, Eric Blake, 2011/02/01
- Re: HAVE_STDBOOL_H, AC_HEADER_STDBOOL, and AM_STDBOOL_H,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: HAVE_STDBOOL_H, AC_HEADER_STDBOOL, and AM_STDBOOL_H, Paul Eggert, 2011/02/04
Re: HAVE_STDBOOL_H, AC_HEADER_STDBOOL, and AM_STDBOOL_H, Russ Allbery, 2011/02/01