Re: [PATCH] di-set.h, ino-map.h: add multiple-inclusion guard

[Bruno Haible]

> > I can revert it, then.  Or leave it...
> > Do you have a preference?
> 
> I'd leave it alone

I'd also leave it alone, for two other reasons:

  - Some typedef or struct definition may be added to the file in the future.

  - Some people use the gcc option "-Wredundant-decls". It produces a warning
    if a header file does not have a multiple-inclusion guard and is included
    twice.

Bruno
-- 
In memoriam Ismail Semed <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ismail_Semed>