[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: getloadavg test
|
From: |
Paul Eggert |
|
Subject: |
Re: getloadavg test |
|
Date: |
Thu, 17 Feb 2011 11:30:23 -0800 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101209 Fedora/3.1.7-0.35.b3pre.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.7 |
On 02/16/2011 03:28 AM, Bruno Haible wrote:
How about this? It's basically what a human
would do when executing the manual test.
Sure, something like that sounds fine. Though I'd
make the upper bound higher than 100. Maybe a million?
Sun bug 4756989 was a user complaining that
SunOS getloadavg messed up when the load factor was greater
than 32768 on a Sun Fire E25K. This was a circa-2004
design. The bug was eventually fixed.
Granted, that was a stressed host, but
high load factors are not that uncommon on real-world
multiple-CPU machines.
Re: getloadavg and errno, Bruno Haible, 2011/02/15
Re: getloadavg on Solaris 2.6, Bruno Haible, 2011/02/17
Re: getloadavg on IRIX, Bruno Haible, 2011/02/17
Re: getloadavg and platforms, Bruno Haible, 2011/02/17