[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug in autoconf-2.64
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: bug in autoconf-2.64 |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Feb 2011 14:05:36 +0100 |
Bruno Haible wrote:
> Hi Jim, Eric,
>
> Additionally, I think it would be useful to modify
>
> tests/test-strcasestr.c
> tests/test-c-strstr.c
> tests/test-c-strcasestr.c
> tests/test-memmem.c
>
> in order to keep the tests in sync, and
>
> m4/strstr.m4
> m4/strcasestr.m4
> m4/memmem.m4
>
> in order to reject the wrong implementation when it comes from glibc or
> cygwin's libc.
Yes.
First priority is to detect the broken ones. Thanks.
- Re: bug in autoconf-2.64, Ralf Wildenhues, 2011/02/24
- Re: bug in autoconf-2.64, Jim Meyering, 2011/02/24
- Re: bug in autoconf-2.64, Jim Meyering, 2011/02/24
- Re: bug in autoconf-2.64, Jim Meyering, 2011/02/24
- Re: bug in autoconf-2.64, Jim Meyering, 2011/02/24
- Re: bug in autoconf-2.64, Eric Blake, 2011/02/24
- Re: bug in autoconf-2.64, Eric Blake, 2011/02/24
- Re: bug in autoconf-2.64, Ralf Wildenhues, 2011/02/24
- Re: bug in autoconf-2.64, Jim Meyering, 2011/02/24
- Re: bug in autoconf-2.64, Eric Blake, 2011/02/25
- [PATCH] strstr: revert patches that introduced bug and pessimization, Eric Blake, 2011/02/25