[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: fsusage: revert unintended change on AIX, Cygwin, Interix
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: fsusage: revert unintended change on AIX, Cygwin, Interix |
Date: |
Sat, 23 Jul 2011 17:06:57 +0200 |
Bruno Haible wrote:
>> 2) To undo the patch that introduces check_f_blocks_size, because
>> - on MacOS X 10.7 it is not needed any more after 1),
>> - on AIX and Cywin it causes non-POSIX API to be used for no reason,
>> - it kills portability to Interix 3.5.
>
> Slight correction: It is still needed after 1), at least on MacOS X 10.5.
> But only on MacOS X. So here's the proposed patch 2. Verified on AIX and
> Cygwin;
Thanks again.
This looks fine.
> I don't have access to an Interix machine.
No problem. It seems to have so few coreutils/gnulib users that
it barely qualifies as a reasonable portability target.
> 2011-07-23 Bruno Haible <address@hidden>
>
> fsusage: Restore previous behaviour on AIX, Cygwin, Interix.
> * m4/fsusage.m4 (gl_FILE_SYSTEM_USAGE): Enforce a 64-bit struct statvfs
> f_blocks field only on MacOS X.
...
- Re: bug#9140: Coreutils Bug on OSX 10.7 (Lion), Paul Eggert, 2011/07/22
- Re: bug#9140: Coreutils Bug on OSX 10.7 (Lion), Jim Meyering, 2011/07/22
- Re: bug#9140: Coreutils Bug on OSX 10.7 (Lion), Bruno Haible, 2011/07/23
- fsusage: add large volume support on glibc/Hurd, HP-UX 11, Solaris, MacOS X, Bruno Haible, 2011/07/23
- fsusage: revert unintended change on AIX, Cygwin, Interix, Bruno Haible, 2011/07/23
- Re: fsusage: revert unintended change on AIX, Cygwin, Interix,
Jim Meyering <=
- Re: bug#9140: Coreutils Bug on OSX 10.7 (Lion), Jim Meyering, 2011/07/23
- fsusage: add large volume support on AIX, Bruno Haible, 2011/07/23
Re: bug#9140: Coreutils Bug on OSX 10.7 (Lion), Bruno Haible, 2011/07/24