[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] maint.mk: don't maintain a second build-aux variable.
From: |
Gary V. Vaughan |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] maint.mk: don't maintain a second build-aux variable. |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Oct 2011 15:09:43 +0700 |
Hi Jim,
On 25 Oct 2011, at 00:37, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>>
>> _build-aux = libltdl/build-aux
>
> Wouldn't that break things for those who customize build_aux?
Ah, I see what you mean now (will it break for clients who are
customizing with build_aux already).
No, I don't think it will, because setting only build_aux in
cfg.mk is already unreliable, so clients will likely have had to
search for and customize _build-aux too.
I don't know whether it's worse to leave those folks with a half
working build by adding to my patch something like:
build_aux ?= $(srcdir)/$(_build-aux)
But, I definitely like the idea of throwing an error if what
they have is inconsistent. I'll await your reply and then roll
an updated patch.
Cheers,
--
Gary V. Vaughan (gary AT gnu DOT org)
- [PATCH] maint.mk: don't maintain a second build-aux variable., Gary V. Vaughan, 2011/10/23
- Re: [PATCH] maint.mk: don't maintain a second build-aux variable., Jim Meyering, 2011/10/24
- Re: [PATCH] maint.mk: don't maintain a second build-aux variable., Gary V. Vaughan, 2011/10/24
- Re: [PATCH] maint.mk: don't maintain a second build-aux variable., Jim Meyering, 2011/10/25
- Re: [PATCH] maint.mk: don't maintain a second build-aux variable., Gary V. Vaughan, 2011/10/25
- Re: [PATCH] maint.mk: don't maintain a second build-aux variable., Gary V. Vaughan, 2011/10/26
- Re: [PATCH] maint.mk: don't maintain a second build-aux variable., Jim Meyering, 2011/10/27
- Re: [PATCH] maint.mk: don't maintain a second build-aux variable., Gary V. Vaughan, 2011/10/27
- Re: [PATCH] maint.mk: don't maintain a second build-aux variable., Jim Meyering, 2011/10/28
Re: [PATCH] maint.mk: don't maintain a second build-aux variable.,
Gary V. Vaughan <=