[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 1/4] ptsname_r: new module
From: |
Karl Berry |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 1/4] ptsname_r: new module |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Nov 2011 23:10:26 GMT |
But it reduces the readability of the .texi file,
True, but it's one of those things you have to do to get correct output.
Basically I was explaining to Eric that he should not use M-x fill-paragraph
I know. And I was explaining that trying to make a convention "don't
use fill-paragraph" seems doomed to failure to me. It is reflex with
me to do that, anyway. Especially if any source line is >79 chars.
I wouldn't want to have half of the spellings be "MacOS X" and the other
half "address@hidden".
Indeed. It would be simpler to use "MacOSX" and avoid the issue
entirely.
Anyway ...
Best,
k
- Re: [PATCH 2/4] ptsname_r-tests: new test module, (continued)
[PATCH 4/4] ptsname_r: work around FreeBSD issue, Eric Blake, 2011/11/07
[PATCH 3/4] ptsname_r: port to Solaris, Eric Blake, 2011/11/07
[PATCH 1/4] ptsname_r: new module, Eric Blake, 2011/11/07
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] ptsname_r: new module, Bruno Haible, 2011/11/08
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] ptsname_r: new module, Karl Berry, 2011/11/08
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] ptsname_r: new module, Bruno Haible, 2011/11/08
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] ptsname_r: new module,
Karl Berry <=
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] ptsname_r: new module, Jim Meyering, 2011/11/09
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] ptsname_r: new module, Bruno Haible, 2011/11/09
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] ptsname_r: new module, Karl Berry, 2011/11/09
- Re: info readers, Bruno Haible, 2011/11/09
- Re: info readers, Karl Berry, 2011/11/09
- Re: info readers, Bruno Haible, 2011/11/09
Re: [PATCH 1/4] ptsname_r: new module, Paul Eggert, 2011/11/09
Re: [PATCH 1/4] ptsname_r: new module, Bruno Haible, 2011/11/10
Re: [PATCH 1/4] ptsname_r: new module, Jim Meyering, 2011/11/10
Re: [PATCH 1/4] ptsname_r: new module, Bruno Haible, 2011/11/10