Re: [PATCH] pipe2: document lack of thread-safety in replacement

bug-gnulib

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] pipe2: document lack of thread-safety in replacement

From:	Bruno Haible
Subject:	Re: [PATCH] pipe2: document lack of thread-safety in replacement
Date:	Thu, 26 Jan 2012 22:22:48 +0100
User-agent:	KMail/4.7.4 (Linux/3.1.0-1.2-desktop; KDE/4.7.4; x86_64; ; )

Eric Blake wrote:
> > -But the replacement function is not atomic in multi-threaded programs.
> > +But the replacement function is not atomic; this matters in multi-threaded
> > +programs that spawn child processes.
> 
> I like it.

Thanks for the review. I've pushed it.

Bruno

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

[PATCH] pipe2: document lack of thread-safety in replacement, Eric Wong, 2012/01/25
- Re: [PATCH] pipe2: document lack of thread-safety in replacement, Bruno Haible, 2012/01/26
  - Re: [PATCH] pipe2: document lack of thread-safety in replacement, Eric Blake, 2012/01/26
    - Re: [PATCH] pipe2: document lack of thread-safety in replacement, Bruno Haible, 2012/01/26
    - Re: [PATCH] pipe2: document lack of thread-safety in replacement, Eric Blake, 2012/01/26
    - Re: [PATCH] pipe2: document lack of thread-safety in replacement, Bruno Haible <=
- Re: [PATCH] pipe2: document lack of thread-safety in replacement, Eric Blake, 2012/01/26
  - Re: [PATCH] pipe2: document lack of thread-safety in replacement, Eric Wong, 2012/01/26
    - Re: [PATCH] pipe2: document lack of thread-safety in replacement, Eric Blake, 2012/01/26

Prev by Date: Re: sys/types.h on Android includes stdint.h before defining time_t
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 10/11] quote consistently and make tests pass with new quoting from gnulib
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] pipe2: document lack of thread-safety in replacement
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] pipe2: document lack of thread-safety in replacement
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread