[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Comparing binary files with Diff 3.2 compiled with MinGW
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: Comparing binary files with Diff 3.2 compiled with MinGW |
Date: |
Sun, 13 May 2012 13:20:40 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 |
On 05/12/2012 07:00 PM, Bruno Haible wrote:
> +# define set_binary_mode(fd, mode) ((void) (fd), (void) (mode), O_BINARY)
With that approach, code like this:
set_binary_mode (current->desc, prev_mode);
yields the following undesirable diagnostic:
io.c:127:8: error: statement with no effect [-Werror=unused-value]
How about something like the following definition instead?
It would also have the advantage of better type-checking on
POSIX hosts.
static int
set_binary_mode (int fd, int mode)
{
(void) fd;
(void) mode;
return O_BINARY;
}
- Re: Comparing binary files with Diff 3.2 compiled with MinGW, (continued)
- Re: Comparing binary files with Diff 3.2 compiled with MinGW, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/05/12
- Re: Comparing binary files with Diff 3.2 compiled with MinGW, Paul Eggert, 2012/05/12
- Re: Comparing binary files with Diff 3.2 compiled with MinGW, Bruno Haible, 2012/05/12
- Re: Comparing binary files with Diff 3.2 compiled with MinGW, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/05/13
- Re: Comparing binary files with Diff 3.2 compiled with MinGW, Paul Eggert, 2012/05/13
- Re: Comparing binary files with Diff 3.2 compiled with MinGW, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/05/14
- Re: Comparing binary files with Diff 3.2 compiled with MinGW,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: Comparing binary files with Diff 3.2 compiled with MinGW, Bruno Haible, 2012/05/13
- Re: Comparing binary files with Diff 3.2 compiled with MinGW, Eric Blake, 2012/05/14