[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gettext vs. gnulib m4 macros
From: |
Daiki Ueno |
Subject: |
Re: gettext vs. gnulib m4 macros |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Feb 2015 10:48:56 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Karl Berry <address@hidden> writes:
> > Paul (I guess) - so can the massive auto-updating of the copyright year
> > list refrain from touching them?
>
> Sure, just put their names into config/srclist.txt; that's the plan,
> right?
>
> Bruno never wanted to use the srclist.txt sync mechanism, preferring to
> do it by hand, and so far Daiki has followed suit.
Yes, but I generally prefer automation and I agree with adding them to
srclist.txt (unless there is still any concern with the recent gettext
releases; hopefully not, as I haven't heard any build breaker since last
summer).
> Also, may I suggest putting a comment at the top of the gettext files
> saying "this file is maintained in gettext".
Sure, will do.
Regards,
--
Daiki Ueno
- gettext vs. gnulib m4 macros, Karl Berry, 2015/02/23
- Re: gettext vs. gnulib m4 macros, Paul Eggert, 2015/02/23
- Re: gettext vs. gnulib m4 macros, Karl Berry, 2015/02/23
- Re: gettext vs. gnulib m4 macros,
Daiki Ueno <=
- Re: gettext vs. gnulib m4 macros, Paul Eggert, 2015/02/23
- Re: gettext vs. gnulib m4 macros, Karl Berry, 2015/02/24
- Re: gettext vs. gnulib m4 macros, Paul Eggert, 2015/02/24
- Re: gettext vs. gnulib m4 macros, Karl Berry, 2015/02/26
- Re: gettext vs. gnulib m4 macros, Daiki Ueno, 2015/02/26