[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is Gnulib still targeting C89?
|
From: |
Bruno Haible |
|
Subject: |
Re: Is Gnulib still targeting C89? |
|
Date: |
Thu, 27 Apr 2017 11:53:49 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
KMail/5.1.3 (Linux/4.4.0-75-generic; KDE/5.18.0; x86_64; ; ) |
Tim Rice wrote:
> UnixWare (a currently shipping product) has a C89 compiler.
This product appears to be of zero relevance in the market: I haven't seen any
reference to it in mailing lists or bug reports since ca. 1997.
Currently shipping? The version number is at 7.1.4 since 2004 [1], and the
"new features" of the current release are, in particular, "USB 2.0 support" [2].
Enough said.
Bruno
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UnixWare#Version_history
[2] http://sco.com/products/unixware714/index.html
- [PATCH] parse-datetime: use labs for long int, Ruediger Meier, 2017/04/07
- Re: [PATCH] parse-datetime: use labs for long int, Paul Eggert, 2017/04/22
- Re: [PATCH] parse-datetime: use labs for long int, Rüdiger Meier, 2017/04/22
- Re: [PATCH] parse-datetime: use labs for long int, Pádraig Brady, 2017/04/22
- Re: [PATCH] parse-datetime: use labs for long int, Paul Eggert, 2017/04/22
- Is Gnulib still targeting C89?, Paul Eggert, 2017/04/24
- Re: Is Gnulib still targeting C89?, Tim Rice, 2017/04/26
- Re: Is Gnulib still targeting C89?, Paul Eggert, 2017/04/27
- Re: Is Gnulib still targeting C89?, Tim Rice, 2017/04/27
- Re: Is Gnulib still targeting C89?,
Bruno Haible <=
Re: [PATCH] parse-datetime: use labs for long int, Pádraig Brady, 2017/04/22