[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 8/9] posix: Use enum for __glob_pattern_type result
From: |
Adhemerval Zanella |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 8/9] posix: Use enum for __glob_pattern_type result |
Date: |
Wed, 6 Sep 2017 10:03:53 -0300 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 |
On 06/09/2017 01:18, Paul Eggert wrote:
> Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
>> +enum glob_pattern_type_t
>> +{
>> + __GLOB_NONE = 0x0,
>> + __GLOB_SPECIAL = 0x1,
>> + __GLOB_BACKSLASH = 0x2,
>> + __GLOB_BRACKET = 0x4
>> +};
>
> The identifier glob_pattern_type_t is not used elsewhere, so let's omit it.
> This makes it clearer that we're merely defining handy names for int
> constants, as opposed to defining a new type.
Ack.
>
> Also, names like __GLOB_NONE could cause problems when Gnulib is used on
> non-GNU platforms, which might use those names for other purposes. As
> glob_internal.h is not user-visible, let's use ordinary names. I suggest
> GLOBPAT_NONE, GLOBPAT_SPECIAL, etc., as done in the attached patch, which I
> installed into Gnulib.
My understanding was double underscore identifiers are reserved for
implementation
(C99 7.1.3 Reserved identifiers). But I do not have a strong opinion here, I
am
ok with your approach.