[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gnulib-tool.py
From: |
Tim Rühsen |
Subject: |
Re: gnulib-tool.py |
Date: |
Wed, 06 Sep 2017 18:42:01 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/5.2.3 (Linux/4.12.0-1-amd64; KDE/5.28.0; x86_64; ; ) |
On Dienstag, 5. September 2017 23:35:54 CEST Dmitry Selyutin wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> that's exactly what I've done today. I've just pushed some changes into
> repository; could you please try the latest version?
> I didn't have time to integrate --no-changelog support yet (it seems it was
> either unimplemented before or appeared after project was completed).
> Thank you for trying the Python version; please let me know if it works for
> you or if there are some other errors to be fixed.
>
> P.S. I've started cleaning the entire code base, also rewriting some slow
> paths, but there is a lot of work to be done; stay tuned. :-)
Awesome, Dmitry ! \o/
Works like a charm on a quick test (will do some more testing the next days).
That's really *much* faster than before.
Now:
real 0m34,265s
user 0m31,524s
sys 0m2,279s
Before:
real 1m20,295s
user 1m16,460s
sys 0m16,050s
The bottleneck now is autoreconf followed by libtoolize :-)
If you remove the gnulib-tool from branch 'pygnulib' and instead add a link
gnulib-tool -> gnulib-tool.py then one wouldn't have to edit ./bootstrap.
I just can't say how much I appreciate your work !
Regards, Tim
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- gnulib-tool.py, Tim Rühsen, 2017/09/04
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: gnulib-tool.py, Dmitry Selyutin, 2017/09/05
- Re: gnulib-tool.py,
Tim Rühsen <=
- Re: gnulib-tool.py, Dmitry Selyutin, 2017/09/07
- Re: gnulib-tool.py, Bruno Haible, 2017/09/07
- Re: gnulib-tool.py, Dmitry Selyutin, 2017/09/08
- Re: gnulib-tool.py, Darshit Shah, 2017/09/08
- Re: gnulib-tool.py, Dmitry Selyutin, 2017/09/08
- Re: gnulib-tool.py, Tim Rühsen, 2017/09/11
- Re: gnulib-tool.py, Dmitry Selyutin, 2017/09/11