[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FTP->HTTPS; maybe HTTP->HTTPS for Gnulib?
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: FTP->HTTPS; maybe HTTP->HTTPS for Gnulib? |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Sep 2017 18:51:49 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/5.1.3 (Linux/4.4.0-93-generic; KDE/5.18.0; x86_64; ; ) |
address@hidden wrote:
> So why not force proper software? Have the server require TLS 1.2, disable
> HTTP. Those who have clients that can't cope, let them sort it out.
> It doesn't make sense to implement insecure mechanisms to work around people
> who don't want to use hte right software.
Go trolling [1][2] elsewhere, please. [3][4]
Or create a political party.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_troll
[2] http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=troll
[3] https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2016-10/msg00024.html
[4] https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-08/msg00215.html
- Re: FTP->HTTPS; maybe HTTP->HTTPS for Gnulib?, (continued)
- Re: FTP->HTTPS; maybe HTTP->HTTPS for Gnulib?, Jim Meyering, 2017/09/12
- Re: FTP->HTTPS; maybe HTTP->HTTPS for Gnulib?, Bruno Haible, 2017/09/12
- Re: FTP->HTTPS; maybe HTTP->HTTPS for Gnulib?, Tim Rühsen, 2017/09/13
- Re: FTP->HTTPS; maybe HTTP->HTTPS for Gnulib?, Paul Eggert, 2017/09/13
- Re: FTP->HTTPS; maybe HTTP->HTTPS for Gnulib?, Bruno Haible, 2017/09/13
- Re: FTP->HTTPS; maybe HTTP->HTTPS for Gnulib?, Paul Eggert, 2017/09/13
- Re: FTP->HTTPS; maybe HTTP->HTTPS for Gnulib?, Bruno Haible, 2017/09/13
- Re: FTP->HTTPS; maybe HTTP->HTTPS for Gnulib?, Paul.Koning, 2017/09/14
- Re: FTP->HTTPS; maybe HTTP->HTTPS for Gnulib?,
Bruno Haible <=