Re: [PATCH] ISO 8601 basic format and decimal hours, minutes

[Paul Eggert]

Assaf Gordon wrote:
> Adding new accepted formats is good,
> but rejecting (or changing the meaning of) currently-accepted formats
> is a much more problematic decision due to breaking existing programs.
>
> I think that before continuing, it should be discussed and decided
> whether this is acceptable or not (Paul, Jim?).

I'd rather not reject existing valid input unless there's a good reason. Is 
there one? I didn't see one in the original proposal (admittedly I didn't read 
it word for word).