bug-gnulib
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: isnan function conflicts with C++ standard library declarations


From: Martin Storsjö
Subject: Re: isnan function conflicts with C++ standard library declarations
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 22:51:48 +0300 (EEST)
User-agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)

Hi Bruno,

On Wed, 28 Aug 2019, Bruno Haible wrote:

Hi Martin,

Well in addition to macOS, I can also still reproduce the issue on Linux
(Ubuntu 18.04, with its default GCC 7) as well, so maybe it's an issue
with newer C++ standard headers, regardless of platform?

Indeed. I can reproduce it with GCC >= 6. And since clang sometimes uses the
C++ header files from GCC, we also have to enable the workaround for clang.
It is apparently not needed with AIX xlc, HP-UX cc, Solaris cc.

Fixed by changing the condition to
 #if __GNUC__ >= 6 || defined __clang__

Thanks! That should probably work, and good to know in which GCC version this changed.

This issue can crop up e.g. when trying to build gettext for mingw (which
has got the gnulib isnan function bundled, even if it isn't used).

I'm regularly building gettext on mingw and haven't seen this issue. Therefore
thanks again for the reproduction example.

I ran into it while trying to build gettext with clang (with my pure-llvm
based toolchain, at https://github.com/mstorsjo/llvm-mingw in case you're
interested), so I presume there's something that goes different in gettext
with clang/lld compared to gcc

Yes. It would make sense to compare the config.status file generated by an llvm
build with those generated by a gcc build.

Thanks for the pointers - I'll see if I'll dig further into that to see what the differences stem from.

I only run into it
if building a shared gettext, not with a static-only build, for some
reason.

The reason is that gettext is written in C, and only a few files are getting
compiled by a C++ compiler, as a workaround to a problem with DLL import of
variables and variable initializers. This workaround is not enabled when
--disable-shared is specified.

Ah, thanks, that explains things a bit.

// Martin




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]