[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: new module 'access'
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: new module 'access' |
Date: |
Sat, 28 Sep 2019 16:54:55 +0300 |
> From: Bruno Haible <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2019 15:29:42 +0200
>
> > > The module does not attempt to handle all of these, just the first one,
> > > because
> > > - the function access() is located at the C library level,
> > > - it is compatible with what the old MSVCRT (without the argument check
> > > for the mode in _access()) does.
> >
> > Well, at the very least how about documenting this subtlety?
>
> Done as follows:
>
>
> 2019-09-28 Bruno Haible <address@hidden>
>
> access: Document limitations on Windows.
> Suggested by Zaretskii <address@hidden>.
> * doc/posix-functions/access.texi: Mention two limitations on Windows.
Thanks!
- [PATCH] findprog-in: Set errno to indicate why NULL was returned., Paul Smith, 2019/09/14
- Re: [PATCH] findprog-in: Set errno to indicate why NULL was returned., Paul Smith, 2019/09/14
- new module 'access', Bruno Haible, 2019/09/15
- Re: new module 'access', Eli Zaretskii, 2019/09/16
- Re: new module 'access', Bruno Haible, 2019/09/16
- Re: new module 'access', Eli Zaretskii, 2019/09/17
- Re: new module 'access', Bruno Haible, 2019/09/28
- Re: new module 'access', Eli Zaretskii, 2019/09/28
- Re: new module 'access', Bruno Haible, 2019/09/28
- Re: new module 'access',
Eli Zaretskii <=
Re: [PATCH] findprog-in: Set errno to indicate why NULL was returned., Bruno Haible, 2019/09/15