[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Handling of runpaths
From: |
Jeffrey Walton |
Subject: |
Re: Handling of runpaths |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Jul 2020 03:24:01 -0400 |
On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 4:16 PM Bruno Haible <bruno@clisp.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Jeffrey,
>
> > I noticed my runpaths are re-ordered in libraries like
> > libgettextsrc.so, libtextstyle.so, libgettextpo.so, libgettextlib.so,
> > libgettextlib.so, libintl.so and libunistring.so. For example, I use
> > LDFLAGS of:
> >
> > -Wl,-runpath,'$ORIGIN/../lib' -Wl,-runpath,$(prefix)/lib
> > -Wl,--enable-new-dtags
> >
> > Later, when I audit the runpaths, I see the following (when building
> > OpenSSH and dependencies for /opt/ssh):
> >
> > RUNPATH: /opt/ssh/lib:$ORIGIN/../lib
> >
> > Notice the ordering has been changed.
> >
> > Is the re-ordering of runpaths expected?
>
> I don't know. You would need
> 1) to find the specification(s) of -runpath. It must be recent: a
> GNU ld from 2015 does not support it,
> 2) to determine (using "gcc -v") whether it's libtool, gcc, or the
> linker which does the reordering.
>
> The specification of DT_RUNPATH appears to be in [1].
Thanks Bruno.
I was talking to the OpenLDAP folks. Their module has 3 problems, so
it was the one I looked at first.
They knew the reordering problem. They said it was libtool. They said
in the past they used to provide a hacked libtool to work around it.
They said they stopped hacking libtool because it needed to happen too
frequently (each update?).
Jeff