Re: [PATCH 1/3] tests: suppress some unwanted -fanalyzer checking

[Bruno Haible]

Paul Eggert wrote:
> Unless I'm misunderstanding you things should work as-is, as 
> manywarnings should omit a -Wxxx option if gcc complains that it's not 
> supported.

It could be that a warning option is accepted by the front-end's option
parser, but unknown to the #pragma handler.

> And anyway manywarnings doesn't mention the relevant -Wxxx 
> options; they're merely implied by -fanalyzer (and are listed as such in 
> build-aux/gcc-warning.spec).

OK, then I agree we're safe w.r.t. these options.

Bruno