[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [PATCH] fix NFSv4 acl detection on F39
From: |
Ondrej Valousek |
Subject: |
RE: [PATCH] fix NFSv4 acl detection on F39 |
Date: |
Mon, 15 May 2023 11:50:57 +0000 |
Hi Paul,
Ok first of all, thanks for taking initiative on this, I am unable to proceed
on this on my own at the moment.
I see few problems with this:
1. The calculation of the 'listbufsize' is incorrect in your patch. It will
_not_work as you expected and won't limit the number of syscalls (which is why
we came up with this patch, right?). Check with my original proposal, we really
need to check for 'system.nfs4' xattr name presence here
2. It mistakenly detects an ACL presence on files which do not have any ACL on
NFSv4 filesystem. Digging further it seems that kernel in F39 behaves
differently to the previous kernels:
F38:
# getfattr -m . /path_to_nfs4_file
# file: path_to_nfs4_file
system.nfs4_acl <---- only single xattr
detected
F39:
# getfattr -m . /path_to_nfs4_file
# file: path_to_nfs4_file
system.nfs4_acl
system.posix_acl_default
/* SOMETIMES even shows this */
system.posix_acl_default
Now I faintly recall there was an activity in to move POSIX acls calculation
from userspace to kernel (now Jeff in CC will hopefully clarify this), but it
seems to me that presence of the system.posix* attributes no longer signals the
presence of the actual ACLs, so our code thinks that POSIX acls are present
instead (which makes no sense on NFSv4).
Ondrej
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>
Sent: pátek 12. května 2023 21:27
To: Bruno Haible <bruno@clisp.org>
Cc: bug-gnulib@gnu.org; Ondrej Valousek <ondrej.valousek.xm@renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix NFSv4 acl detection on F39
Oops, that patch has a bug in the rare case where the stack buffer isn't large
enough: it might access freed storage. Fixed by installing the attached further
patch.
- [PATCH] fix NFSv4 acl detection on F39, Ondrej Valousek, 2023/05/01
- Re: [PATCH] fix NFSv4 acl detection on F39, Bruno Haible, 2023/05/01
- Re: [PATCH] fix NFSv4 acl detection on F39, Paul Eggert, 2023/05/01
- Re: [PATCH] fix NFSv4 acl detection on F39, Paul Eggert, 2023/05/02
- Re: [PATCH] fix NFSv4 acl detection on F39, Ondrej Valousek, 2023/05/03
- Re: [PATCH] fix NFSv4 acl detection on F39, Paul Eggert, 2023/05/03
- RE: [PATCH] fix NFSv4 acl detection on F39, Ondrej Valousek, 2023/05/04
- Re: [PATCH] fix NFSv4 acl detection on F39, Bruno Haible, 2023/05/04
- Re: [PATCH] fix NFSv4 acl detection on F39, Paul Eggert, 2023/05/12
- Re: [PATCH] fix NFSv4 acl detection on F39, Paul Eggert, 2023/05/12
- RE: [PATCH] fix NFSv4 acl detection on F39,
Ondrej Valousek <=
- Re: [PATCH] fix NFSv4 acl detection on F39, Paul Eggert, 2023/05/15
- Message not available
- Re: [PATCH] fix NFSv4 acl detection on F39, Paul Eggert, 2023/05/15
- RE: [PATCH] fix NFSv4 acl detection on F39, Ondrej Valousek, 2023/05/15
- Re: [PATCH] fix NFSv4 acl detection on F39, Paul Eggert, 2023/05/15
- Re: [PATCH] fix NFSv4 acl detection on F39, Ondrej Valousek, 2023/05/16
- Re: [PATCH] fix NFSv4 acl detection on F39, Jeff Layton, 2023/05/15
- Re: [PATCH] fix NFSv4 acl detection on F39, Trond Myklebust, 2023/05/15
- Re: [PATCH] fix NFSv4 acl detection on F39, Jeff Layton, 2023/05/15
- Re: [PATCH] fix NFSv4 acl detection on F39, Trond Myklebust, 2023/05/15
- Re: [PATCH] fix NFSv4 acl detection on F39, Christian Brauner, 2023/05/16