[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: nstrftime.c fails to build due to memset overflow
|
From: |
Bruno Haible |
|
Subject: |
Re: nstrftime.c fails to build due to memset overflow |
|
Date: |
Thu, 18 May 2023 23:50:29 +0200 |
Paul Eggert wrote:
> The goal here is software reliability not pacifying compilers
But when "gcc -Wall" reports 10 warnings to me, and I don't notice
that one of them is an actual bug because I mentally discard all of
them "oh these new warnings must all be false positives by gcc",
there is something wrong in the way I worked.
This happened to me today, with a full gnulib testdir.
Hence my wish to silence the gcc warnings in gnulib, on recent glibc
systems with recent gcc versions.
> or clang, or whatever.
I'm not talking about clang here. Clang produces tons of warnings, too
much to be useful for my average use.
Bruno
- Re: nstrftime.c fails to build due to memset overflow, Pádraig Brady, 2023/05/18
- Re: nstrftime.c fails to build due to memset overflow, Bruno Haible, 2023/05/18
- astrxfrm: Fix use-after-free bug, Bruno Haible, 2023/05/18
- silence some "defined but not used" warnings, Bruno Haible, 2023/05/18
- Re: nstrftime.c fails to build due to memset overflow, Bruno Haible, 2023/05/18
- Re: nstrftime.c fails to build due to memset overflow, Bruno Haible, 2023/05/18
- silence some gcc -Wmaybe-uninitialized warnings, Bruno Haible, 2023/05/18
- Re: nstrftime.c fails to build due to memset overflow, Paul Eggert, 2023/05/18
- Re: nstrftime.c fails to build due to memset overflow,
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: nstrftime.c fails to build due to memset overflow, Pádraig Brady, 2023/05/19
Re: nstrftime.c fails to build due to memset overflow, Paul Eggert, 2023/05/18