Re: limits-h: Fix BOOL_MAX value

[Collin Funk]

On 2/12/24 5:09 AM, Bruno Haible wrote:
>   BOOL_WIDTH = 1, BOOL_MAX = 1
> with CC="gcc -std=gnu2x", but
>   BOOL_WIDTH = 8, BOOL_MAX = 1
> with CC="clang -std=gnu2x" (for all clang version 14 ... 17).

Same results with GCC 14 and Clang 19.

> Apparently I had misinterpreted the meaning of BOOL_WIDTH. (Cf.
> ISO C 23 § E.(3)).

Today I learned. I was under the impression that BOOL_WIDTH would be
the same as the underlying type (8-bit char for example). Am I
misreading or would this be a Clang bug? Both ISO C 23 § 5.2.4.2.1 and
Annex E seem to say BOOL_WIDTH must be exactly 1. That would also make
the previous definition correct. :)