From: Richard Frith-Macdonald <richard@brainstorm.co.uk>
Date: Mon Apr 08, 2002 03:43:42 PM Europe/London
To: Serg Stoyan <stoyan@on.com.ua>
Subject: Re: patch to gnustep-base (Unicode and others)
On Monday, April 8, 2002, at 10:13 AM, Serg Stoyan wrote:
RFM> OK ... guess I was wrong about that ... it *does* seem to say
strings
RFM> should be converted to unicode ... but that's
incorrect/misleading
RFM> documentation.
What documentation do you reccomend me to use? Apple's FoundationKit
and AppKit frameworks documentation? It says the same. What else?
Maybe i misunderstand you at some point?
I don't think so ... I'm just saying that the wording in the
documentation on
this point is poor ... and is misleading/wrong. That doesn't mean to
imply
that there is another better set of documentation anywhere.
When you read the documentation in depth, and look at what the various
implementations actually do, you can tell what they intended to say.
RFM> Thanks, I've added them (I converted to ascii with \u escapes for
RFM> consistency with the other files, but that should make no
difference).
By the way, you probably forgot to upload these files to CVS.
Yes, sorry, they are definately comitted now.