Re: Request for review: NSHost patch

[Adam Fedor]

I think I remember looking at it and it looked OK. But I think I wanted  
someone like Richard to look at it.  Jeremy has an assignment on file,  
so it is OK to put in from that standpoint.

On May 21, 2005, at 12:55 AM, Alex Perez wrote:

> Did this patch ever get reviewed/applied?
>
> Jeremy Tregunna wrote:
>
> > Good morning;
> >
> > I've recently written a patch against NSHost to make it IPv6 aware,  
> > and am curious to hear some of your thoughts about it.
> >
> > I've tried to keep from adding any new methods (though I did add one  
> > to the "Private" category as you can see in the patch); and verified  
> > no breakage here with IPv4 addressing, and IPv6 addressing appears to  
> > be working fine (again here, using KAME version 20010528/FreeBSD).
> >
> > Any suggestions, critisims are welcome.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > -Jeremy Tregunna
> > jtregunna@fuqn.ca
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> > --
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bug-gnustep mailing list
> > Bug-gnustep@gnu.org
> > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnustep
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-gnustep mailing list
> Bug-gnustep@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnustep