[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Licensing for IceCat
From: |
Giuseppe Scrivano |
Subject: |
Re: Licensing for IceCat |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Jun 2008 22:47:49 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) |
Hello,
even if we can redistribute IceCat under GPL license terms, we decided
to keep the original tri-license Mozilla Firefox license, in this way
if Mozilla people will consider our efforts useful they can use them
without any problem. The package should keep this same license too.
Giuseppe
"Kamisamanou Burgess" <address@hidden> writes:
> Upon reviewing the licensing for Firefox I found this:
>
>
> Core Mozilla project source code is licensed under a disjunctive
> tri-license giving you the choice of one of the three following sets of
> free software/open source licensing terms:
>
> + Mozilla Public License, version 1.1 or later
> + GNU General Public License, version 2.0 or later
> + GNU Lesser General Public License, version 2.1 or later
>
> and that raised this question:
> When I package IceCat for Fedora what license to I use. GPLv2 or v3?
> --
> Sayonara,
> Kamisamanou Burgess
> http://www.kamisamanou.net
> --
> http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
- Licensing for IceCat, Kamisamanou Burgess, 2008/06/25
- Re: Licensing for IceCat,
Giuseppe Scrivano <=