|
From: | David Englund/Hedlund |
Subject: | Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] Introducing Extension Signing: A Safer Add-on Experience |
Date: | Mon, 30 Mar 2015 05:31:37 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.5.0 |
On 2015-03-30 05:23, Svetlana A. Tkachenko wrote:
My understanding is that Firefox just will tell the user that an add-on that is going to be installed is either signed or not signed. But I have not read the article.https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2015/02/10/extension-signing-safer-experience/Such signing requirement doesn't let the user run a modified copy of an extension on their own computer, until the user figures out how to disable it. IceCat folks would probably just disable the signing requirement by default. Svetlana -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |